Sonoelastographic evaluation of diaphragmatic thickness and stiffness in dialysis patients

This study aimed to quantitatively and noninvasively assess diaphragmatic alterations in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) using ultrasonography (US) and shear wave elastography (SWE). This prospective cross-sectional study included 69 dialysis patients (HD, n = 37; PD, n = 32) and 60 demographically matched healthy controls. Right hemidiaphragm was evaluated using greyscale US and SWE through the 8th–10th intercostal spaces in the mid-axillary line. Thickness and stiffness were measured at end-expiration and peak inspiration phases. Clinical data, laboratory parameters, and dialysis-related metrics were recorded. Comparative and correlational analyses were performed using appropriate statistical methods. At peak inspiration, the measurements were 2.24 ± 0.25 mm and 25.61 ± 6.15 kPa for the HD group, 2.53 ± 0.23 mm and 32.79 ± 5.31 kPa for the PD group, and 2.86 ± 0.29 mm and 47.68 ± 6.67 kPa for the control group. Significant differences were observed between the groups for both parameters (p < 0.001). At end expiration, diaphragm thickness and stiffness were 1.69 ± 0.20 mm/19.46 ± 4.37 kPa, 1.75 ± 0.19 mm/22.62 ± 4.84 kPa, and 2.00 ± 0.19 mm/33.26 ± 4.62 kPa in the HD, PD, and control groups, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). ROC analysis indicated excellent diagnostic performance of these parameters for distinguishing dialysis patients from controls (AUC 0.806–0.987). Furthermore, diaphragm parameters correlated significantly with dialysis duration, adequacy, comorbidity, and serum albumin levels. Diaphragm thickness and stiffness are reduced in dialysis patients, especially those on hemodialysis. US and SWE may serve as early imaging biomarkers for respiratory sarcopenia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-025-01932-6
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sonoelastographic evaluation of diaphragmatic thickness and stiffness in dialysis patients

Nurullah Dağ, Haci Bayram Berktas, Aysun Gunduz Uslu, Veysel Burulday
1 citations
BMC Medical Imaging
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
1.43
article

Sonoelastographic evaluation of diaphragmatic thickness and stiffness in dialysis patients

Nurullah Dağ, Haci Bayram Berktas, Aysun Gunduz Uslu, Veysel Burulday
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study aimed to quantitatively and noninvasively assess diaphragmatic alterations in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) using ultrasonography (US) and shear wave elastography (SWE). This prospective cross-sectional study included 69 dialysis patients (HD, n = 37; PD, n = 32) and 60 demographically matched healthy controls. Right hemidiaphragm was evaluated using greyscale US and SWE through the 8th–10th intercostal spaces in the mid-axillary line. Thickness and stiffness were measured at end-expiration and peak inspiration phases. Clinical data, laboratory parameters, and dialysis-related metrics were recorded. Comparative and correlational analyses were performed using appropriate statistical methods. At peak inspiration, the measurements were 2.24 ± 0.25 mm and 25.61 ± 6.15 kPa for the HD group, 2.53 ± 0.23 mm and 32.79 ± 5.31 kPa for the PD group, and 2.86 ± 0.29 mm and 47.68 ± 6.67 kPa for the control group. Significant differences were observed between the groups for both parameters (p < 0.001). At end expiration, diaphragm thickness and stiffness were 1.69 ± 0.20 mm/19.46 ± 4.37 kPa, 1.75 ± 0.19 mm/22.62 ± 4.84 kPa, and 2.00 ± 0.19 mm/33.26 ± 4.62 kPa in the HD, PD, and control groups, respectively. There were significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). ROC analysis indicated excellent diagnostic performance of these parameters for distinguishing dialysis patients from controls (AUC 0.806–0.987). Furthermore, diaphragm parameters correlated significantly with dialysis duration, adequacy, comorbidity, and serum albumin levels. Diaphragm thickness and stiffness are reduced in dialysis patients, especially those on hemodialysis. US and SWE may serve as early imaging biomarkers for respiratory sarcopenia.

BMC Medical ImagingVol. 25(1)
Inonu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sonoelastographic evaluation of diaphragmatic thickness and stiffness in dialysis patients — Nurullah Dağ, Haci Bayram Berktas, et al. · BMC Medical Imaging (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS