A review of mechanical mass finishing methods in post-processing applications of additively manufactured parts

Today, additive manufacturing (AM) continues its development by constantly increasing its popularity. The main reasons for this are rapid prototyping and easy production of complex shaped parts. However, since the poor surface quality of AM components negatively affects their performance, it is inevitable to apply post-processing methods. While the surface qualities of post-processed AM components are improving, it is necessary to pay attention to the changes that will occur in the surface integrity characteristics. Mechanical mass finishing methods both improve the surface quality of AM parts, whether metallic or plastic, and have positive effects on surface integrity. This study reviews the studies on the applicability of vibratory surface finishing (VSF), barrel finishing (BF) and drag finishing (DF) to AM parts, which are mechanical mass finishing methods also called tribofinishing. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods compared to each other are also discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1504/ijrapidm.2025.148796
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of mechanical mass finishing methods in post-processing applications of additively manufactured parts

Özhan Kıtay, Yusuf Kaynak
International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

A review of mechanical mass finishing methods in post-processing applications of additively manufactured parts

Özhan Kıtay, Yusuf Kaynak
article en

Abstract

Today, additive manufacturing (AM) continues its development by constantly increasing its popularity. The main reasons for this are rapid prototyping and easy production of complex shaped parts. However, since the poor surface quality of AM components negatively affects their performance, it is inevitable to apply post-processing methods. While the surface qualities of post-processed AM components are improving, it is necessary to pay attention to the changes that will occur in the surface integrity characteristics. Mechanical mass finishing methods both improve the surface quality of AM parts, whether metallic or plastic, and have positive effects on surface integrity. This study reviews the studies on the applicability of vibratory surface finishing (VSF), barrel finishing (BF) and drag finishing (DF) to AM parts, which are mechanical mass finishing methods also called tribofinishing. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods compared to each other are also discussed.

International Journal of Rapid ManufacturingVol. 10(2)
Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi (TR), Maltepe University (TR), Marmara University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A review of mechanical mass finishing methods in post-processing applications of additively manufactured parts — Özhan Kıtay, Yusuf Kaynak · International Journal of Rapid Manufacturing (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS