The Irrelevance of “Peak Fame” on Celebrity Candidate Success

ABSTRACT Objective Does it matter “when” a celebrity runs for office? The political scientists who study celebrity candidates need to consider an important insight from communications and media scholars. Fame is a time‐dependent variable. Someone who was famous 40 years ago may no longer be widely known today. Methods A list of celebrity political candidates who ran for office in the United States between 1865 and 2022 was created to measure campaign success. Results In terms of winning an election, it does not matter whether a celebrity candidate runs at the peak of their fame or waits until decades later. What does matter is how famous they are at the time they run for office. Conclusions A‐ and B‐list celebrities are more electorally successful than C‐list celebrities so long as their ranking tracks their level of fame over time. Future research on this topic needs to account for the ephemeral nature of fame.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science Quarterly
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.70085
Primary Topic
Media, Gender, and Advertising
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Irrelevance of “Peak Fame” on Celebrity Candidate Success

Richard T. Longoria, Daniela Saucedo Reyes
Social Science Quarterly
Media, Gender, and Advertising
article

The Irrelevance of “Peak Fame” on Celebrity Candidate Success

Richard T. Longoria, Daniela Saucedo Reyes
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective Does it matter “when” a celebrity runs for office? The political scientists who study celebrity candidates need to consider an important insight from communications and media scholars. Fame is a time‐dependent variable. Someone who was famous 40 years ago may no longer be widely known today. Methods A list of celebrity political candidates who ran for office in the United States between 1865 and 2022 was created to measure campaign success. Results In terms of winning an election, it does not matter whether a celebrity candidate runs at the peak of their fame or waits until decades later. What does matter is how famous they are at the time they run for office. Conclusions A‐ and B‐list celebrities are more electorally successful than C‐list celebrities so long as their ranking tracks their level of fame over time. Future research on this topic needs to account for the ephemeral nature of fame.

Social Science QuarterlyVol. 106(6)
The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Media, Gender, and Advertising
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.