Old Wine in New Wineskins: How Remnant Data Challenges Forensics and the Law

Imagine buying a new storage device—a USB drive or maybe even a cheap SSD. The user connects it to their system and suddenly finds themselves having access to data that is left on the seemingly blank slate of the new drive. Farfetched? Not at all, as research has shown. Through recycling and refurbishing devices and especially storage chips, the phenomenon of remnant or reconstructable data on seemingly new devices has made its way to the general public. This begs the question of whom this data is attributed to: The new possessor of the device or rather a possibly unknown third party? This paper examines the possibilities forensic professionals have to recover and reconstruct data from remnants and fragments and what evidentiary value temporary and deleted files may hold. In a complementing legal discussion, the effects of a—possibly limited—evidentiary value are discussed. Special consideration is given to the following leading questions: First, how does one possess data? Second, how do cases like remnant data or file fragments influence the evidentiary value of forensic findings? And third, which conclusions can be drawn for forensic professionals, as well as the legal prosecution and defense?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Threats Research and Practice
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3769683
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Old Wine in New Wineskins: How Remnant Data Challenges Forensics and the Law

Sebastian Hilgert
Digital Threats Research and Practice
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Old Wine in New Wineskins: How Remnant Data Challenges Forensics and the Law

Sebastian Hilgert
article en

Abstract

Imagine buying a new storage device—a USB drive or maybe even a cheap SSD. The user connects it to their system and suddenly finds themselves having access to data that is left on the seemingly blank slate of the new drive. Farfetched? Not at all, as research has shown. Through recycling and refurbishing devices and especially storage chips, the phenomenon of remnant or reconstructable data on seemingly new devices has made its way to the general public. This begs the question of whom this data is attributed to: The new possessor of the device or rather a possibly unknown third party? This paper examines the possibilities forensic professionals have to recover and reconstruct data from remnants and fragments and what evidentiary value temporary and deleted files may hold. In a complementing legal discussion, the effects of a—possibly limited—evidentiary value are discussed. Special consideration is given to the following leading questions: First, how does one possess data? Second, how do cases like remnant data or file fragments influence the evidentiary value of forensic findings? And third, which conclusions can be drawn for forensic professionals, as well as the legal prosecution and defense?

Digital Threats Research and PracticeVol. 6(4)
Federal Office of Civil protection and Disaster Assistance (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Old Wine in New Wineskins: How Remnant Data Challenges Forensics and the Law — Sebastian Hilgert · Digital Threats Research and Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS