A – 82 Exploring the Clinical Utility of the ECLECTIC Framework: Advancing Cultural Neuropsychology for Pediatric Refugees

Abstract Objective Refugee children and families arriving to the US encounter barriers to accessing healthcare services such as low health literacy, lack of interpretation services, medical mistrust, sociocultural or religious factors, and immigration status. Refugees disproportionately develop psychological symptoms and major mental illness after resettlement due to exposure to traumatic events. This can impact brain development and, along with other developmental, neurologic, and genetic conditions, may require neuropsychological evaluations to establish appropriate care. The ECLECTIC Framework (Fujii, 2018) outlines aspects of culture that influence data collection and interpretation in neuropsychological evaluations. We evaluated the ethical and cultural factors specific to the context of being a refugee that should be incorporated in tandem with a cultural model to provide ethical pediatric neuropsychological evaluations. Method Neuropsychological evaluations of three pediatric refugees are described using the ECLECTIC Framework. Names and identifying information have been changed. Considerations for sociocultural factors and practical recommendations for approaching the evaluation process of pediatric refugees are presented. Results The ECLECTIC Framework provides a foundation for understanding the nuanced factors for evaluation of pediatric refugees such as limited access to collateral data, cultural and religious beliefs, community support and resilience, and the impact of documentation status on parental work, income, and governmental benefits. Conclusion Using cultural models can guide equitable neuropsychological services and reduce unrecognized ethnocentric biases. However, adaptation of the ECLECTIC Framework is required for accurate and appropriate use with pediatric refugees. This would allow for more personalized, precision, evidence-informed care to provide realistic and culturally responsive guidance and recommendations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.105
Primary Topic
Educational and Psychological Assessments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A – 82 Exploring the Clinical Utility of the ECLECTIC Framework: Advancing Cultural Neuropsychology for Pediatric Refugees

Beatriz MacDonald, Ila A Iverson, Lizabeth Jordan, Veronica Bordes Edgar et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Educational and Psychological Assessments
article

A – 82 Exploring the Clinical Utility of the ECLECTIC Framework: Advancing Cultural Neuropsychology for Pediatric Refugees

Beatriz MacDonald, Ila A Iverson, Lizabeth Jordan, Veronica Bordes Edgar, Anna Cichocki
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Refugee children and families arriving to the US encounter barriers to accessing healthcare services such as low health literacy, lack of interpretation services, medical mistrust, sociocultural or religious factors, and immigration status. Refugees disproportionately develop psychological symptoms and major mental illness after resettlement due to exposure to traumatic events. This can impact brain development and, along with other developmental, neurologic, and genetic conditions, may require neuropsychological evaluations to establish appropriate care. The ECLECTIC Framework (Fujii, 2018) outlines aspects of culture that influence data collection and interpretation in neuropsychological evaluations. We evaluated the ethical and cultural factors specific to the context of being a refugee that should be incorporated in tandem with a cultural model to provide ethical pediatric neuropsychological evaluations. Method Neuropsychological evaluations of three pediatric refugees are described using the ECLECTIC Framework. Names and identifying information have been changed. Considerations for sociocultural factors and practical recommendations for approaching the evaluation process of pediatric refugees are presented. Results The ECLECTIC Framework provides a foundation for understanding the nuanced factors for evaluation of pediatric refugees such as limited access to collateral data, cultural and religious beliefs, community support and resilience, and the impact of documentation status on parental work, income, and governmental benefits. Conclusion Using cultural models can guide equitable neuropsychological services and reduce unrecognized ethnocentric biases. However, adaptation of the ECLECTIC Framework is required for accurate and appropriate use with pediatric refugees. This would allow for more personalized, precision, evidence-informed care to provide realistic and culturally responsive guidance and recommendations.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Educational and Psychological Assessments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.