A – 116 Use of Cognitive Screeners in the Detection of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA)

Abstract Objective Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by gradual progression of primary language dysfunction. There is minimal research examining the use of cognitive screening measures with individuals with PPA. Method This study explored performance of PPA patients on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The study included a retrospective chart review of neuropsychological reports of 42 adults (age range = 54-89; M age = 72.98; 67% female; 95% Caucasian; M education = 14.83 years) diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to PPA following comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Results Raw scores and diagnostic classification accuracy were calculated on the MMSE and MoCA. The MMSE accurately identified 56% of individuals with MCI (M=24.56; n=9) and 85% with dementia (M=17; n=20). The MMSE did not identify MCI/dementia for 3/4 agrammatic, 2/10 logopenic, and 2/11 semantic patients, using the recommended cutoffs. The MoCA accurately classified 100% of MCI (M=16.5; n=4) and dementia (M=11.89; n=9) patients. Patients administered MoCA had an average of 1.54 years since symptom onset, compared to 2.79 years with the MMSE. Conclusion Preliminary data suggests the MoCA may be more sensitive to detecting PPA and possibly able to detect PPA earlier in the disease course compared to the MMSE. Discrepancies between the language items across measures likely accounts for this. Additional investigation is warranted to determine how screening performance may align with neuropsychological testing.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.138
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A – 116 Use of Cognitive Screeners in the Detection of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA)

Richard Phenis, Katie L. Granier, Kayla Trites
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

A – 116 Use of Cognitive Screeners in the Detection of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA)

Richard Phenis, Katie L. Granier, Kayla Trites
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Primary progressive aphasia (PPA) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by gradual progression of primary language dysfunction. There is minimal research examining the use of cognitive screening measures with individuals with PPA. Method This study explored performance of PPA patients on the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The study included a retrospective chart review of neuropsychological reports of 42 adults (age range = 54-89; M age = 72.98; 67% female; 95% Caucasian; M education = 14.83 years) diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia due to PPA following comprehensive neuropsychological evaluation. Results Raw scores and diagnostic classification accuracy were calculated on the MMSE and MoCA. The MMSE accurately identified 56% of individuals with MCI (M=24.56; n=9) and 85% with dementia (M=17; n=20). The MMSE did not identify MCI/dementia for 3/4 agrammatic, 2/10 logopenic, and 2/11 semantic patients, using the recommended cutoffs. The MoCA accurately classified 100% of MCI (M=16.5; n=4) and dementia (M=11.89; n=9) patients. Patients administered MoCA had an average of 1.54 years since symptom onset, compared to 2.79 years with the MMSE. Conclusion Preliminary data suggests the MoCA may be more sensitive to detecting PPA and possibly able to detect PPA earlier in the disease course compared to the MMSE. Discrepancies between the language items across measures likely accounts for this. Additional investigation is warranted to determine how screening performance may align with neuropsychological testing.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.