B – 35 Linguistic Diversity and Bilingualism in Post-TBI Cognitive Recovery: Is There a Cognitive Reserve Effect?

Abstract Objective Cognitive reserve (CR) has gained attention as a factor influencing recovery following mild to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), with bilingualism emerging as a key variable. This review synthesizes current evidence on the impact of linguistic diversity and bilingualism on cognitive recovery after TBI, aiming to determine whether bilingualism provides a CR effect. Specifically, it explores how bilingualism influences cognitive outcomes such as attention, executive function, and verbal abilities across acute and chronic recovery phases. Method Articles were selected based on the following criteria: publication within the past ten years in peer-reviewed journals, focus on cognitive reserve, cultural and linguistic factors impacting TBI, measurable cognitive outcomes, and inclusion of CR indicators such as education, occupation, and multilingual experience. Pediatric and adult populations were included to capture the impact of TBI across the lifespan. Results Evidence suggests bilingual individuals often show better cognitive recovery than monolinguals, particularly in the chronic phase. Enhanced performance on visuomotor tasks involving processing speed supports the hypothesis that bilingualism enhances neural efficiency and flexibility. However, bilinguals may perform worse in acute recovery, showing variability by stage. Cultural and linguistic factors—such as limited access to culturally competent care, language barriers, and stigma—can hinder rehabilitation for culturally and linguistically diverse individuals, leading to poorer psychosocial and functional outcomes. Conclusion Despite inconsistencies, findings indicate bilingualism and linguistic diversity are important in understanding TBI recovery. Bilingualism may act as a CR factor supporting long-term cognitive outcomes. Future research should explore how CR, linguistic experience, and sociocultural background interact to improve recovery models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.186
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B – 35 Linguistic Diversity and Bilingualism in Post-TBI Cognitive Recovery: Is There a Cognitive Reserve Effect?

Rafael Humberto Rojas Millán, Gesenia Sloan-Peña, Juliana Ortiz
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

B – 35 Linguistic Diversity and Bilingualism in Post-TBI Cognitive Recovery: Is There a Cognitive Reserve Effect?

Rafael Humberto Rojas Millán, Gesenia Sloan-Peña, Juliana Ortiz
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Cognitive reserve (CR) has gained attention as a factor influencing recovery following mild to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), with bilingualism emerging as a key variable. This review synthesizes current evidence on the impact of linguistic diversity and bilingualism on cognitive recovery after TBI, aiming to determine whether bilingualism provides a CR effect. Specifically, it explores how bilingualism influences cognitive outcomes such as attention, executive function, and verbal abilities across acute and chronic recovery phases. Method Articles were selected based on the following criteria: publication within the past ten years in peer-reviewed journals, focus on cognitive reserve, cultural and linguistic factors impacting TBI, measurable cognitive outcomes, and inclusion of CR indicators such as education, occupation, and multilingual experience. Pediatric and adult populations were included to capture the impact of TBI across the lifespan. Results Evidence suggests bilingual individuals often show better cognitive recovery than monolinguals, particularly in the chronic phase. Enhanced performance on visuomotor tasks involving processing speed supports the hypothesis that bilingualism enhances neural efficiency and flexibility. However, bilinguals may perform worse in acute recovery, showing variability by stage. Cultural and linguistic factors—such as limited access to culturally competent care, language barriers, and stigma—can hinder rehabilitation for culturally and linguistically diverse individuals, leading to poorer psychosocial and functional outcomes. Conclusion Despite inconsistencies, findings indicate bilingualism and linguistic diversity are important in understanding TBI recovery. Bilingualism may act as a CR factor supporting long-term cognitive outcomes. Future research should explore how CR, linguistic experience, and sociocultural background interact to improve recovery models.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.