B – 19 Validation of Embedded PCL-5 Symptom Validity Indices in Active-Duty Military Population

Abstract Objective Shura et al. (2023) and Schroeder et al. (2024) developed three symptom validity indices for the PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) examining overreported posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology in veteran populations. The current study aimed to cross-validate this previous research in an active-duty sample. Method The sample consisted of multiple criterion groups comprised of active duty service members (N = 165). Criterion for valid or invalid responses were based on Personality Assessment Inventory symptom validity scales (i.e., NIM and MAL). Three PCL-5 symptom validity indices were examined: the PCL-5 Symptom Severity scale (PSS), the PCL-5 Extreme Symptom scale (PES), and the PCL-5 Rare Items scale (PRI). Results Area under the curve statistics ranged from .73 to .76. The PSS, PES, and PRI all met classification accuracy goals. The PSS achieved the highest sensitivity rate (.50) when maintaining specificity at or above .90. The PES had a sensitivity of .40, when specificity was maintained at .90. However, the PRI demonstrated a low sensitivity of 0.2 at a specificity at .90. Optimal cutoff scores were identified for each scale (PES ≥16, PSS ≥58, and the PRI ≥3). Conclusion These findings provide support for the validation of the PSS, PES, and PRI as PCL-5 over-report measures within an active duty sample. The PSS and PES demonstrated superior classification statistics, as the PRI was hampered by lower sensitivity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.171
Primary Topic
Health and Wellbeing Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B – 19 Validation of Embedded PCL-5 Symptom Validity Indices in Active-Duty Military Population

Cammy Chicota-Carroll, Patrick Armistead‐Jehle, James K. Aden, Alexis N Troili-Fletes
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Health and Wellbeing Research
article

B – 19 Validation of Embedded PCL-5 Symptom Validity Indices in Active-Duty Military Population

Cammy Chicota-Carroll, Patrick Armistead‐Jehle, James K. Aden, Alexis N Troili-Fletes
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Shura et al. (2023) and Schroeder et al. (2024) developed three symptom validity indices for the PTSD Checklist for the DSM-5 (PCL-5) examining overreported posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptomatology in veteran populations. The current study aimed to cross-validate this previous research in an active-duty sample. Method The sample consisted of multiple criterion groups comprised of active duty service members (N = 165). Criterion for valid or invalid responses were based on Personality Assessment Inventory symptom validity scales (i.e., NIM and MAL). Three PCL-5 symptom validity indices were examined: the PCL-5 Symptom Severity scale (PSS), the PCL-5 Extreme Symptom scale (PES), and the PCL-5 Rare Items scale (PRI). Results Area under the curve statistics ranged from .73 to .76. The PSS, PES, and PRI all met classification accuracy goals. The PSS achieved the highest sensitivity rate (.50) when maintaining specificity at or above .90. The PES had a sensitivity of .40, when specificity was maintained at .90. However, the PRI demonstrated a low sensitivity of 0.2 at a specificity at .90. Optimal cutoff scores were identified for each scale (PES ≥16, PSS ≥58, and the PRI ≥3). Conclusion These findings provide support for the validation of the PSS, PES, and PRI as PCL-5 over-report measures within an active duty sample. The PSS and PES demonstrated superior classification statistics, as the PRI was hampered by lower sensitivity.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Health and Wellbeing Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.