B – 41 Executive Functioning Errors are Associated with Provider’s Perception of Patient Impulsivity During Subacute Neurological Rehabilitation

Abstract Objective In-hospital falls are a major concern for patients with neurological disorders, particularly those experiencing executive dysfunction. It remains unclear whether fall risk ratings, meant to safeguard patients, are influenced more by healthcare providers' perceptions of patient impulsivity or by measurable executive dysfunction. This study examined the relationship between fall risk, executive function, and impulsivity in an acute neurorehabilitation setting. Method Twenty-four inpatients with stroke or traumatic brain injury completed a brief neurocognitive assessment. Nurses rated patients’ impulsivity by completing the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Adult Version, Inhibition subscale. Executive function error composites were derived by averaging error frequencies across key tasks, resulting in an Executive Function Error Index (EFEI), Self-corrected and Uncorrected Error Composites. Pearson correlations were conducted to evaluate associations between fall risk, executive functioning errors, and perceived impulsivity. Results Impulsivity and fall risk were significantly associated, with impulsivity accounting for 30% of the variance. EFEI and perceived impulsivity were significantly associated, with EFEI accounting for 26% of the variance. No significant relationship was detected between perceived impulsivity and self-corrected errors; however, uncorrected errors were significantly associated with higher perceived impulsivity, with uncorrected errors accounting for 19% of the variance. Conclusion Patients perceived as more impulsive were rated as being at higher risk for falls. Patients rated as more impulsive by providers demonstrated increased executive function errors overall. Findings suggest that poor error detection may underlie provider’s perceptions of patient impulsivity. This study demonstrates the role of neuropsychological assessment of performance monitoring for safety improvement in subacute neurological populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.192
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B – 41 Executive Functioning Errors are Associated with Provider’s Perception of Patient Impulsivity During Subacute Neurological Rehabilitation

A. Ramírez Barragán, Agustı́n Ruiz, Veronica B. Perez
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

B – 41 Executive Functioning Errors are Associated with Provider’s Perception of Patient Impulsivity During Subacute Neurological Rehabilitation

A. Ramírez Barragán, Agustı́n Ruiz, Veronica B. Perez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective In-hospital falls are a major concern for patients with neurological disorders, particularly those experiencing executive dysfunction. It remains unclear whether fall risk ratings, meant to safeguard patients, are influenced more by healthcare providers' perceptions of patient impulsivity or by measurable executive dysfunction. This study examined the relationship between fall risk, executive function, and impulsivity in an acute neurorehabilitation setting. Method Twenty-four inpatients with stroke or traumatic brain injury completed a brief neurocognitive assessment. Nurses rated patients’ impulsivity by completing the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function – Adult Version, Inhibition subscale. Executive function error composites were derived by averaging error frequencies across key tasks, resulting in an Executive Function Error Index (EFEI), Self-corrected and Uncorrected Error Composites. Pearson correlations were conducted to evaluate associations between fall risk, executive functioning errors, and perceived impulsivity. Results Impulsivity and fall risk were significantly associated, with impulsivity accounting for 30% of the variance. EFEI and perceived impulsivity were significantly associated, with EFEI accounting for 26% of the variance. No significant relationship was detected between perceived impulsivity and self-corrected errors; however, uncorrected errors were significantly associated with higher perceived impulsivity, with uncorrected errors accounting for 19% of the variance. Conclusion Patients perceived as more impulsive were rated as being at higher risk for falls. Patients rated as more impulsive by providers demonstrated increased executive function errors overall. Findings suggest that poor error detection may underlie provider’s perceptions of patient impulsivity. This study demonstrates the role of neuropsychological assessment of performance monitoring for safety improvement in subacute neurological populations.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

B – 41 Executive Functioning Errors are Associated with Provider’s Perception of Patient Impulsivity During Subacute Neurological Rehabilitation — A. Ramírez Barragán, Agustı́n Ruiz, et al. · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS