Perspectives and challenges of multidisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of metastatic spinal disease: Insights from an international survey

Abstract Abstract BackgroundAdvances in systemic therapies, radiotherapy, and surgery have made the management of metastatic spinal disease (MSD) more complex, increasing the need for multidisciplinary collaboration. This study aims to explore physicians’ perspectives on multidisciplinary collaboration and to identify challenges in delivering multidisciplinary care for patients with MSD. Methods A cross-sectional, global, internet-based survey was distributed among medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, orthopedic surgeons, and neurosurgeons involved in the management of MSD. Questions focused on the effectiveness of current multidisciplinary collaboration, outcomes of multidisciplinary collaboration, and barriers to providing multidisciplinary care. Results A total of 120 physicians completed the survey: 26 (22%) medical oncologists, 34 (28%) radiation oncologists, 31 (26%) orthopedic surgeons, and 29 (24%) neurosurgeons. Across all four specialties, approximately 75% considered current collaboration among medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and spine surgeons effective. In total, 49% of respondents observed cases in which preventable complications occurred due to a perceived lack of multidisciplinary collaboration, and 69% reported observing cases where a lack of multidisciplinary collaboration resulted in the selection of suboptimal treatment strategies. Overall, respondents reported 162 challenges in delivering multidisciplinary care for patients with MSD, most commonly citing limited regional coordination between hospitals (28%) and insufficient collaboration among specialties (18%). Conclusions Although most respondents viewed current multidisciplinary collaboration as effective, many reported observing cases where a lack of collaboration led to preventable complications or suboptimal care. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration and enhancing regional coordination to improve outcomes for patients with MSD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuro-Oncology Practice
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf102
Primary Topic
Management of metastatic bone disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives and challenges of multidisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of metastatic spinal disease: Insights from an international survey

Britt B.M. Suelmann, Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, N. Kasperts, B Münster et al.
Neuro-Oncology Practice
Management of metastatic bone disease
article

Perspectives and challenges of multidisciplinary collaboration in the treatment of metastatic spinal disease: Insights from an international survey

Britt B.M. Suelmann, Jorrit‐Jan Verlaan, N. Kasperts, B Münster, Shannon M. MacDonald, Philip J. Saylor, Daniel G. Tobert, Mark H. Bilsky, Olivier Q. Groot, Jantijn J G J Amelink
article en

Abstract

Abstract Abstract BackgroundAdvances in systemic therapies, radiotherapy, and surgery have made the management of metastatic spinal disease (MSD) more complex, increasing the need for multidisciplinary collaboration. This study aims to explore physicians’ perspectives on multidisciplinary collaboration and to identify challenges in delivering multidisciplinary care for patients with MSD. Methods A cross-sectional, global, internet-based survey was distributed among medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, orthopedic surgeons, and neurosurgeons involved in the management of MSD. Questions focused on the effectiveness of current multidisciplinary collaboration, outcomes of multidisciplinary collaboration, and barriers to providing multidisciplinary care. Results A total of 120 physicians completed the survey: 26 (22%) medical oncologists, 34 (28%) radiation oncologists, 31 (26%) orthopedic surgeons, and 29 (24%) neurosurgeons. Across all four specialties, approximately 75% considered current collaboration among medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and spine surgeons effective. In total, 49% of respondents observed cases in which preventable complications occurred due to a perceived lack of multidisciplinary collaboration, and 69% reported observing cases where a lack of multidisciplinary collaboration resulted in the selection of suboptimal treatment strategies. Overall, respondents reported 162 challenges in delivering multidisciplinary care for patients with MSD, most commonly citing limited regional coordination between hospitals (28%) and insufficient collaboration among specialties (18%). Conclusions Although most respondents viewed current multidisciplinary collaboration as effective, many reported observing cases where a lack of collaboration led to preventable complications or suboptimal care. These findings highlight the importance of strengthening multidisciplinary collaboration and enhancing regional coordination to improve outcomes for patients with MSD.

Neuro-Oncology Practice
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), Harvard University (US), Utrecht University (NL), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Center for Cancer Research (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Management of metastatic bone disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.