Discourse Analysis and the Politics of Aesthetics: Toward a Method

This study proposes discourse analysis, as developed by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, as a powerful framework for understanding the political dimension of art practices, particularly when given an art-historical focus.It provides a systematic method for studying a broad spectrum of politics, ranging from social movements to state policy, which, when applied to an artistic setting, represents a viable alternative to relational (Bourriaud, Bishop) and philosophical (Rancire) approaches to the politics of aesthetics.Because the method allows for more than texts and actions to be conceived as elements in a discourse, it does not necessarily see, for example, a protest and its image as belonging to separate fields.Thus, there is a fluidity between the aesthetic and the political unified by concepts like hegemony.The study will outline discourse analysis as a methodological framework for approaching aesthetic practices as inherently political and political practices as inherently aesthetic-a method intended to solve the common issues arising when studying and researching art and politics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of the Arts in Society Annual Review
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18848/1833-1866/cgp/v18i01/47-63
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Discourse Analysis and the Politics of Aesthetics: Toward a Method

David A. J. Murrieta Flores
The International Journal of the Arts in Society Annual Review
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Discourse Analysis and the Politics of Aesthetics: Toward a Method

David A. J. Murrieta Flores
article en

Abstract

This study proposes discourse analysis, as developed by Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe, as a powerful framework for understanding the political dimension of art practices, particularly when given an art-historical focus.It provides a systematic method for studying a broad spectrum of politics, ranging from social movements to state policy, which, when applied to an artistic setting, represents a viable alternative to relational (Bourriaud, Bishop) and philosophical (Rancire) approaches to the politics of aesthetics.Because the method allows for more than texts and actions to be conceived as elements in a discourse, it does not necessarily see, for example, a protest and its image as belonging to separate fields.Thus, there is a fluidity between the aesthetic and the political unified by concepts like hegemony.The study will outline discourse analysis as a methodological framework for approaching aesthetic practices as inherently political and political practices as inherently aesthetic-a method intended to solve the common issues arising when studying and researching art and politics.

The International Journal of the Arts in Society Annual ReviewVol. 18(1)
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.