Kants Anteil an der Drucklegung der ‚Streitschrift gegen Eberhard‘ (1790, 1791)

Abstract This study examines Immanuel Kant’s involvement in the publication process of his On a Discovery, whereby Any New Critique of Pure Reason is to be Made Superfluous by an Older One (1790, 1791) based on three letters from Friedrich Nicolovius to Johann Jacob Gebauer. It highlights Kant’s meticulous preparation of the manuscript, his instructions for printing, and his post-publication corrections, including a typographical error in Greek. Despite Kant’s efforts, the first edition contained errors, some of which were addressed in the second edition, primarily through the work of Gebauer’s staff. The study challenges previous assumptions about Kant’s editorial involvement, emphasizing his limited role during the printing process. It also underlines the need for further research into the production history of Kant’s works. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of Kant’s relationship with publishers and the logistical challenges of 18th-century book production.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
editio - International Yearbooks for Scholarly Editing / Internationales Jahrbuch für Editionswissenschaft
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/editio-2025-0012
Primary Topic
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Kants Anteil an der Drucklegung der ‚Streitschrift gegen Eberhard‘ (1790, 1791)

Martín Walter
editio - International Yearbooks for Scholarly Editing / Internationales Jahrbuch für Editionswissenschaft
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
article

Kants Anteil an der Drucklegung der ‚Streitschrift gegen Eberhard‘ (1790, 1791)

Martín Walter
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines Immanuel Kant’s involvement in the publication process of his On a Discovery, whereby Any New Critique of Pure Reason is to be Made Superfluous by an Older One (1790, 1791) based on three letters from Friedrich Nicolovius to Johann Jacob Gebauer. It highlights Kant’s meticulous preparation of the manuscript, his instructions for printing, and his post-publication corrections, including a typographical error in Greek. Despite Kant’s efforts, the first edition contained errors, some of which were addressed in the second edition, primarily through the work of Gebauer’s staff. The study challenges previous assumptions about Kant’s editorial involvement, emphasizing his limited role during the printing process. It also underlines the need for further research into the production history of Kant’s works. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of Kant’s relationship with publishers and the logistical challenges of 18th-century book production.

editio - International Yearbooks for Scholarly Editing / Internationales Jahrbuch für EditionswissenschaftVol. 39(1)
Biogen (Germany) (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Kantian Philosophy and Modern Interpretations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.