Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess Healthcare Professionals’ Views on Parental Presence During Neonatal Resuscitation

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Childbirth is a natural and joyfully anticipated life event for parents and relatives. Yet, in some cases, it can be a medical emergency requiring immediate intervention, i.e., neonatal resuscitation. The majority of newborns breathe spontaneously; a small number, though, may receive basic life support (assisted transition), and an even smaller but clinically significant number require advanced life support (resuscitation). Within the context of family-centered care, the presence of parents during resuscitation has emerged as a factor with potential implications for emotional adjustment, communication with healthcare providers, and early parent-infant bonding. However, the presence of family members during neonatal resuscitation remains a subject of ongoing debate among healthcare professionals (HCPs). Despite increasing recognition of its potential benefits, HCPs' views on parental presence during such critical procedures have not been extensively investigated in Greece. This study aims at developing and validating a tool to assess healthcare professionals' views on parental presence during neonatal resuscitation. <b>Methods</b>: A preliminary questionnaire was developed based on the principles of family-centered care and adapted to the Greek population. The first phase included expert assessment of validity, clarity, and relevance using a modified Delphi method. Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Scale CVI (S-CVI) were calculated. Pilot testing was conducted to assess test-retest reliability. Reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. The study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring anonymity, informed consent, and confidentiality. <b>Results</b>: The questionnaire includes 37-50 items allocated in four sections. It demonstrated excellent content validity (CVI = 1.00) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). Qualitative feedback indicated that the tool is user-friendly and comprehensive. Interestingly, participants expressed genuine concerns regarding the implementation of parental presence in neonatal resuscitation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The questionnaire development process led to a comprehensive tool, ready for large-scale testing in order to further establish its validity and internal consistency.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep15100352
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess Healthcare Professionals’ Views on Parental Presence During Neonatal Resuscitation

Paraskevi Volaki, Nicoletta M. Iacovidou, Abraham Pouliakis, Styliani Paliatsiou et al.
Nursing Reports
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess Healthcare Professionals’ Views on Parental Presence During Neonatal Resuscitation

Paraskevi Volaki, Nicoletta M. Iacovidou, Abraham Pouliakis, Styliani Paliatsiou, Rozeta Sokou, Theodoros T Xanthos, Georgios Kafalidis, Τheodora Boutsikou, Nikoleta A. Xixi, Zoi Iliodromiti
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Childbirth is a natural and joyfully anticipated life event for parents and relatives. Yet, in some cases, it can be a medical emergency requiring immediate intervention, i.e., neonatal resuscitation. The majority of newborns breathe spontaneously; a small number, though, may receive basic life support (assisted transition), and an even smaller but clinically significant number require advanced life support (resuscitation). Within the context of family-centered care, the presence of parents during resuscitation has emerged as a factor with potential implications for emotional adjustment, communication with healthcare providers, and early parent-infant bonding. However, the presence of family members during neonatal resuscitation remains a subject of ongoing debate among healthcare professionals (HCPs). Despite increasing recognition of its potential benefits, HCPs' views on parental presence during such critical procedures have not been extensively investigated in Greece. This study aims at developing and validating a tool to assess healthcare professionals' views on parental presence during neonatal resuscitation. <b>Methods</b>: A preliminary questionnaire was developed based on the principles of family-centered care and adapted to the Greek population. The first phase included expert assessment of validity, clarity, and relevance using a modified Delphi method. Item Content Validity Index (I-CVI) and Scale CVI (S-CVI) were calculated. Pilot testing was conducted to assess test-retest reliability. Reliability was assessed using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses. The study followed the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, ensuring anonymity, informed consent, and confidentiality. <b>Results</b>: The questionnaire includes 37-50 items allocated in four sections. It demonstrated excellent content validity (CVI = 1.00) and good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.86). Qualitative feedback indicated that the tool is user-friendly and comprehensive. Interestingly, participants expressed genuine concerns regarding the implementation of parental presence in neonatal resuscitation. <b>Conclusions</b>: The questionnaire development process led to a comprehensive tool, ready for large-scale testing in order to further establish its validity and internal consistency.

Nursing ReportsVol. 15(10)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), University of West Attica (GR), University General Hospital Attikon (GR)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.