Is the pilot policy for carbon emission trading beneficial for ESG disclosure? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Using the pilot policy for carbon emission trading (PPCET) in China as a quasi-natural experiment setting, we construct a staggered difference-in-difference design to examine the impact of PPCET on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) disclosure. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms over 2009–2020, our findings reveal that the degree of ESG disclosure is significantly higher for treatment firms after implementing PPCET than that before implementing. Moreover, the effect of PPCET on ESG disclosure is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than for non-SOEs. Our findings are robust to a variety of sensitivity tests, are valid after excluding shocks from other policies, and stand after controlling for the endogeneity. Furthermore, the relation between PPCET and ESG disclosure is more pronounced for firms with weak environmental regulation intensity, in non-heavily polluting industries, and with low analyst coverage. Lastly, PPCET promotes environmental and social disclosures, and reduces carbon emission intensity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
China Journal of Accounting Studies
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21697213.2025.2554053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is the pilot policy for carbon emission trading beneficial for ESG disclosure? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Zhihan Cai, Hexin Tao, Xingqiang Du
1 citations
China Journal of Accounting Studies
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
article

Is the pilot policy for carbon emission trading beneficial for ESG disclosure? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Zhihan Cai, Hexin Tao, Xingqiang Du
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Using the pilot policy for carbon emission trading (PPCET) in China as a quasi-natural experiment setting, we construct a staggered difference-in-difference design to examine the impact of PPCET on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) disclosure. Using a sample of Chinese listed firms over 2009–2020, our findings reveal that the degree of ESG disclosure is significantly higher for treatment firms after implementing PPCET than that before implementing. Moreover, the effect of PPCET on ESG disclosure is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than for non-SOEs. Our findings are robust to a variety of sensitivity tests, are valid after excluding shocks from other policies, and stand after controlling for the endogeneity. Furthermore, the relation between PPCET and ESG disclosure is more pronounced for firms with weak environmental regulation intensity, in non-heavily polluting industries, and with low analyst coverage. Lastly, PPCET promotes environmental and social disclosures, and reduces carbon emission intensity.

China Journal of Accounting Studies
Xiamen University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.