Exploring Claims of Critical Race Theory, Divisive Topics, and Indoctrination in the Classroom

Abstract Critical race theory (CRT) and claims of political indoctrination in K–12 classrooms are at the forefront of the ongoing culture wars surrounding public education. Despite a wave of legislative action targeting CRT-related instruction, little systematic evidence documents the extent to which critics’ claims have merit. Using a nationally representative survey of American high school students, we examine the frequency with which students are exposed to CRT-related content and political bias in their classrooms. We further examine how students’ experiences differ by political preference, race/ethnicity, and local political context, finding that classroom content likely mirrors community preferences. Our findings suggest that although some divisive topics are discussed, their frequency and context do not support the claims of the most vocal critics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Finance and Policy
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/edfp.a.423
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Religious Education and Schools
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring Claims of Critical Race Theory, Divisive Topics, and Indoctrination in the Classroom

J. Cameron Anglum, Brian Kisida, Matthew H. Lee, Gary W. Ritter et al.
1 citations
Education Finance and Policy
Religious Education and Schools
8.93
article

Exploring Claims of Critical Race Theory, Divisive Topics, and Indoctrination in the Classroom

J. Cameron Anglum, Brian Kisida, Matthew H. Lee, Gary W. Ritter, Heidi Holmes Erickson, Jennifer S. Gontram
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Critical race theory (CRT) and claims of political indoctrination in K–12 classrooms are at the forefront of the ongoing culture wars surrounding public education. Despite a wave of legislative action targeting CRT-related instruction, little systematic evidence documents the extent to which critics’ claims have merit. Using a nationally representative survey of American high school students, we examine the frequency with which students are exposed to CRT-related content and political bias in their classrooms. We further examine how students’ experiences differ by political preference, race/ethnicity, and local political context, finding that classroom content likely mirrors community preferences. Our findings suggest that although some divisive topics are discussed, their frequency and context do not support the claims of the most vocal critics.

Education Finance and Policy
Brigham Young University (US), Kennesaw State University (US), Lehigh University (US), Saint Louis University (ES), Saint Louis University (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Religious Education and Schools
8.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.