Strategic Discontinuity and Organizational Response: Short-Termism in the European Green Deal

The European Union’s climate and governance agenda, once guided by the ambitious European Green Deal, is showing signs of strategic dilution. This study examines the organizational consequences of recent policy reversals, notably delays in the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Grounded in institutional theory and critical policy analysis, it synthesizes findings from recent academic literature, policy documents, and market data to assess how shifting political priorities influence corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) engagement. The review identifies a pattern in which policy uncertainty fosters symbolic compliance, reduces ESG investment, and weakens internal alignment with sustainability objectives. These dynamics reflect a broader organizational tendency to mirror institutional instability, undermining long-term strategic transformation. The analysis concludes that durable sustainability outcomes require policy frameworks that remain consistent beyond electoral and economic cycles. Recommendations include embedding sustainability commitments into constitutional or statutory provisions, establishing independent oversight mechanisms, and ensuring strategic continuity in governance to protect against short-term political fluctuations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17198698
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Discontinuity and Organizational Response: Short-Termism in the European Green Deal

Ilze Jankovska
Sustainability
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Strategic Discontinuity and Organizational Response: Short-Termism in the European Green Deal

Ilze Jankovska
article en

Abstract

The European Union’s climate and governance agenda, once guided by the ambitious European Green Deal, is showing signs of strategic dilution. This study examines the organizational consequences of recent policy reversals, notably delays in the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) and the Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD). Grounded in institutional theory and critical policy analysis, it synthesizes findings from recent academic literature, policy documents, and market data to assess how shifting political priorities influence corporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) engagement. The review identifies a pattern in which policy uncertainty fosters symbolic compliance, reduces ESG investment, and weakens internal alignment with sustainability objectives. These dynamics reflect a broader organizational tendency to mirror institutional instability, undermining long-term strategic transformation. The analysis concludes that durable sustainability outcomes require policy frameworks that remain consistent beyond electoral and economic cycles. Recommendations include embedding sustainability commitments into constitutional or statutory provisions, establishing independent oversight mechanisms, and ensuring strategic continuity in governance to protect against short-term political fluctuations.

SustainabilityVol. 17(19)
Riga Technical University (LV)
Rīgas Tehniskā Universitāte
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.