Geometrical comparison between instrumented and non-instrumented mouthguards for rugby: A pilot study

Rugby is a sport with a high injury rate. Much has been done to make the sport safer, particularly in terms of limiting and identifying concussions. Recently, instrumented mouthguards have been developed and used to measure events that may lead to concussion. However, these instrumented mouthguards may not have an appropriate geometry regarding shock absorption and comfort. In addition, there is no specific international standard for instrumented mouthguards. This study proposed a geometric analysis of both instrumented and non-instrumented mouthguards. Ten instrumented mouthguards were analysed and compared with three non-instrumented mouthguards. They were inspected visually, with a 3D envelope scan and with a CT scan. The results showed that the mouthguards did not comply with recommendations such as indentation with the lower teeth which may increase injury or fracture risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251382880
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Geometrical comparison between instrumented and non-instrumented mouthguards for rugby: A pilot study

Sébastien Laporte, Philippe Poisson, Laurent Tapie, Philippe Rouch et al.
1 citations
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports injuries and prevention
1.72
article

Geometrical comparison between instrumented and non-instrumented mouthguards for rugby: A pilot study

Sébastien Laporte, Philippe Poisson, Laurent Tapie, Philippe Rouch, Maxime Bourgain, Laura Valdes-Tamayo, Christophe Rignon‐Bret, Sylvain Blanchard, C Chabre, Louis Gey
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Rugby is a sport with a high injury rate. Much has been done to make the sport safer, particularly in terms of limiting and identifying concussions. Recently, instrumented mouthguards have been developed and used to measure events that may lead to concussion. However, these instrumented mouthguards may not have an appropriate geometry regarding shock absorption and comfort. In addition, there is no specific international standard for instrumented mouthguards. This study proposed a geometric analysis of both instrumented and non-instrumented mouthguards. Ten instrumented mouthguards were analysed and compared with three non-instrumented mouthguards. They were inspected visually, with a 3D envelope scan and with a CT scan. The results showed that the mouthguards did not comply with recommendations such as indentation with the lower teeth which may increase injury or fracture risk.

International Journal of Sports Science & CoachingVol. 21(1)
Inserm (FR), Arts et Métiers (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), AR2i (FR), Bordeaux Population Health (FR), Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak (FR), Biomatériaux et Bioingénierie (FR), CS Communication & Systèmes (France) (FR), Unité de Recherche en Biomatériaux Innovant et Interfaces
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sports injuries and prevention
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.