Are There Morphophysiological Airway Alterations in Syndromic Craniosynostosis? A 3D Computed Tomography and CFD Analysis

ObjectivesCharacterize the upper airways (UAW) in individuals with syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) using computed tomography scans and correlate with the airflow dynamics and craniofacial pattern.DesignObservational, cross-sectional study.SettingTertiary craniofacial center.IndividualsTwenty-nine individuals were included, divided in 2 groups: CON (n = 19; 21.2 ± 3.7 y), individuals with no craniofacial anomalies and no UAW morphological alterations, and SCS (n = 10; 22.1 ± 5.1 y) individuals with SCS prior to maxillomandibular surgery.InterventionsVolume (V, cm<sup>3</sup>) and minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA, mm<sup>2</sup>) was calculated (Mimics, Belgium). Computational fluid dynamics (ANSYS, EUA) was performed and flow (F, L/min), pressure (P, Pa), and resistance (R, Pa/[L/min]) were calculated. Cephalometric analysis (SNA[<sup>o</sup>]), ANB[<sup>o</sup>], Ba-S-N[<sup>o</sup>]) was also assessed (Dolphin Imaging, USA).Main OutcomeThe morphophysiology of the UAW in SCS individuals was severely impaired compared with the CON group.ResultsThe SCS group exhibited significant volumetric reduction in the total UAW (-29%), nasal cavity (-21%), and pharynx (-37%) compared with the CON group. The mCSA was 57% smaller in the SCS group. CFD simulations demonstrated decreased flow (-9%), increased pressure (136%), and resistance (156%) in the SCS group. UAW resistance presented a strong positive correlation with mCSA (CON: <i>r</i> = 0.77 / SCS: <i>r</i> = 0.88). Cephalometric findings revealed significant differences between CON and SCS, with the SCS group exhibiting values outside the normal range.ConclusionThe UAW of individuals with SCS was anatomically and functionally impaired, suggesting a significant risk for obstructive sleep apnea.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656241302550
Primary Topic
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are There Morphophysiological Airway Alterations in Syndromic Craniosynostosis? A 3D Computed Tomography and CFD Analysis

Sérgio Henrique Kiemle Trindade, Amelia F. Drake, Ivy Kiemle Trindade‐Suedam, Luiz André Freire Pimenta et al.
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
article

Are There Morphophysiological Airway Alterations in Syndromic Craniosynostosis? A 3D Computed Tomography and CFD Analysis

Sérgio Henrique Kiemle Trindade, Amelia F. Drake, Ivy Kiemle Trindade‐Suedam, Luiz André Freire Pimenta, Michele García-Usó, Marcela Cristina Garnica-Siqueira, Cristiano Tonello, Thiago Henrique dos Santos Antunes Albertassi
article en

Abstract

ObjectivesCharacterize the upper airways (UAW) in individuals with syndromic craniosynostosis (SCS) using computed tomography scans and correlate with the airflow dynamics and craniofacial pattern.DesignObservational, cross-sectional study.SettingTertiary craniofacial center.IndividualsTwenty-nine individuals were included, divided in 2 groups: CON (n = 19; 21.2 ± 3.7 y), individuals with no craniofacial anomalies and no UAW morphological alterations, and SCS (n = 10; 22.1 ± 5.1 y) individuals with SCS prior to maxillomandibular surgery.InterventionsVolume (V, cm<sup>3</sup>) and minimal cross-sectional area (mCSA, mm<sup>2</sup>) was calculated (Mimics, Belgium). Computational fluid dynamics (ANSYS, EUA) was performed and flow (F, L/min), pressure (P, Pa), and resistance (R, Pa/[L/min]) were calculated. Cephalometric analysis (SNA[<sup>o</sup>]), ANB[<sup>o</sup>], Ba-S-N[<sup>o</sup>]) was also assessed (Dolphin Imaging, USA).Main OutcomeThe morphophysiology of the UAW in SCS individuals was severely impaired compared with the CON group.ResultsThe SCS group exhibited significant volumetric reduction in the total UAW (-29%), nasal cavity (-21%), and pharynx (-37%) compared with the CON group. The mCSA was 57% smaller in the SCS group. CFD simulations demonstrated decreased flow (-9%), increased pressure (136%), and resistance (156%) in the SCS group. UAW resistance presented a strong positive correlation with mCSA (CON: <i>r</i> = 0.77 / SCS: <i>r</i> = 0.88). Cephalometric findings revealed significant differences between CON and SCS, with the SCS group exhibiting values outside the normal range.ConclusionThe UAW of individuals with SCS was anatomically and functionally impaired, suggesting a significant risk for obstructive sleep apnea.

The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial JournalVol. 63(2)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Hospital of Sobrapar (BR), Universidade Sagrado Coração (BR), Instituição Toledo de Ensino (BR), Columbia University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.