Data Collection Methods in Program Evaluation: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches

Data collection is the cornerstone of program evaluation, shaping the reliability, validity, and usefulness of findings. This article examines qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches, highlighting their applications in nonprofit and development contexts, especially in resource-limited environments. It explores how interviews, focus groups, case studies, surveys, statistical data, and structured observations generate complementary insights. Mixed-methods designs are presented as a bridge between depth and breadth, enhancing validity and interpretive power. Challenges such as low literacy, language barriers, and financial constraints are addressed with practical strategies for adaptation. Drawing on examples from literacy, vocational training, health, and microfinance programs, the article demonstrates how rigorous yet context-sensitive data collection supports accountability, evidence-based decision-making, and program sustainability.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64357/neya-gjnps-tr-ev-imp-as-05
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data Collection Methods in Program Evaluation: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Data Collection Methods in Program Evaluation: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches

Anna Neya Kazanskaia
article en

Abstract

Data collection is the cornerstone of program evaluation, shaping the reliability, validity, and usefulness of findings. This article examines qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods approaches, highlighting their applications in nonprofit and development contexts, especially in resource-limited environments. It explores how interviews, focus groups, case studies, surveys, statistical data, and structured observations generate complementary insights. Mixed-methods designs are presented as a bridge between depth and breadth, enhancing validity and interpretive power. Challenges such as low literacy, language barriers, and financial constraints are addressed with practical strategies for adaptation. Drawing on examples from literacy, vocational training, health, and microfinance programs, the article demonstrates how rigorous yet context-sensitive data collection supports accountability, evidence-based decision-making, and program sustainability.

Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.