Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA primary-series vaccination in Qatar: An integrated epidemiological and economic analysis

Qatar implemented a mass primary-series vaccination campaign to mitigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this program both before and after onset of the omicron wave. An economic evaluation was conducted from the public healthcare system perspective between January 5, 2021, and September 18, 2023. Cost-effectiveness was determined using an epidemiological retrospective cohort study and health economic modeling that compared the cohort of individuals who received two vaccine doses with the unvaccinated cohort with respect to incidence of infection, incidence of severe COVID-19 forms, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and medical costs. During the pre-omicron phase, primary-series vaccination incurred an additional cost of $104,422,358, led to a gain of 724.7 QALYs, and savings of $54,790,858 in direct medical costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $68,485 per QALY gained. The number needed to vaccinate was 35.4 individuals (95% CI: 24.4-49.9) to prevent one infection and 718.0 individuals (95% CI: 469.4-984.0) to prevent one severe COVID-19 outcome. The cost per infection averted was $3,180 (95% CI: $2,189-$4,484) and per severe COVID-19 outcome averted was $64,468 (95% CI: $42,146-$88,354). Vaccination of individuals ≥50 years of age, those more clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19, and those with multiple coexisting conditions was substantially more cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness of primary-series vaccination was substantially reduced during the omicron phase, but vaccination remained cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the findings. Primary-series vaccination was cost-effective with an ICER below the 1 GDP per capita threshold during the pre-omicron phase and within the 1-3 GDP per capita thresholds during the omicron phase. Targeted vaccination strategies for those most vulnerable to COVID-19 were the most cost-effective and remained essential, even in situations of moderate vaccine effectiveness or reduced infection severity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0331654
Citations
1
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA primary-series vaccination in Qatar: An integrated epidemiological and economic analysis

Laith Jamal Abu-Raddad, Gheyath K. Nasrallah, Hadi Mohamad Yassine, Hiam S. Chemaitelly et al.
1 citations
PLoS ONE
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.40
article

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA primary-series vaccination in Qatar: An integrated epidemiological and economic analysis

Laith Jamal Abu-Raddad, Gheyath K. Nasrallah, Hadi Mohamad Yassine, Hiam S. Chemaitelly, Abdullatif Al‐Khal, Roberto Bertollini, Anvar Hassan Kaleeckal, Andrew Jeremijenko, Riyazuddin Mohammad Shaik, Adeel A. Butt, Ali Nizar Latif, Hanan F. Abdul Rahim, Houssein H. Ayoub, Patrick Tang, Peter Coyle, Zaina Al-Kanaani, Mohamed Ghaith Al‐Kuwari, Mohammad R. Hasan, Einas Al‐Kuwari, Hamad Eid Al-Romaihi, Mohamed H. Al-Thani, Asmaa A. Al Thani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Qatar implemented a mass primary-series vaccination campaign to mitigate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this program both before and after onset of the omicron wave. An economic evaluation was conducted from the public healthcare system perspective between January 5, 2021, and September 18, 2023. Cost-effectiveness was determined using an epidemiological retrospective cohort study and health economic modeling that compared the cohort of individuals who received two vaccine doses with the unvaccinated cohort with respect to incidence of infection, incidence of severe COVID-19 forms, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and medical costs. During the pre-omicron phase, primary-series vaccination incurred an additional cost of $104,422,358, led to a gain of 724.7 QALYs, and savings of $54,790,858 in direct medical costs. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $68,485 per QALY gained. The number needed to vaccinate was 35.4 individuals (95% CI: 24.4-49.9) to prevent one infection and 718.0 individuals (95% CI: 469.4-984.0) to prevent one severe COVID-19 outcome. The cost per infection averted was $3,180 (95% CI: $2,189-$4,484) and per severe COVID-19 outcome averted was $64,468 (95% CI: $42,146-$88,354). Vaccination of individuals ≥50 years of age, those more clinically vulnerable to severe COVID-19, and those with multiple coexisting conditions was substantially more cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness of primary-series vaccination was substantially reduced during the omicron phase, but vaccination remained cost-effective. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the findings. Primary-series vaccination was cost-effective with an ICER below the 1 GDP per capita threshold during the pre-omicron phase and within the 1-3 GDP per capita thresholds during the omicron phase. Targeted vaccination strategies for those most vulnerable to COVID-19 were the most cost-effective and remained essential, even in situations of moderate vaccine effectiveness or reduced infection severity.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), University of British Columbia (CA), Cornell University (US), Ministry of Public Health (QA), Primary Health Care (QA), Hamad bin Khalifa University (QA), Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar (QA), Hamad Medical Corporation (QA), Qatar University (QA), London School of Economics and Political Science (GB), McMaster University (CA)
Gilead Sciences, Hamad Medical Corporation, Sidra Medicine, Qatar University, Weill Cornell Medical College, Weill Cornell Medicine - Qatar
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.