Partial verification bias correction using scaled inverse probability resampling for binary diagnostic tests

Diagnostic accuracy studies are crucial for evaluating new tests before their clinical application. These tests are compared with gold standard tests, and accuracy measures such as sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) are often calculated. However, these studies frequently suffer from partial verification bias (PVB) due to selective verification of patients, which leads to biased accuracy estimates. Among the methods for correcting PVB under the missing-at-random assumption for binary diagnostic tests, a bootstrap-based method known as the inverse probability bootstrap (IPB) was proposed. IPB demonstrated low bias for estimating Sn and Sp, but exhibited higher standard errors (SE) than other PVB correction methods and only corrected the distribution of the verified portion of the PVB data. This paper introduces two new methods to address these limitations: scaled inverse probability weighted resampling (SIPW) and scaled inverse probability weighted balanced resampling (SIPW-B), both built upon IPB. Using simulated and clinical datasets, SIPW and SIPW-B were compared against IPB and other existing methods (Begg and Greenes', inverse probability weighting estimator, and multiple imputation). For the simulated data sets, different combinations of disease prevalence (0.4 and 0.1), Sn (0.3 to 0.9), Sp (0.6 and 0.9), and sample sizes (200 and 1000) were generated. Two commonly used clinical datasets in PVB correction studies were also used. Performance was evaluated using bias and SE for the simulated data. Simulation results showed that both new methods outperformed IPB by producing lower bias and SE for Sn and Sp estimation, showing results comparable to existing methods, and demonstrating good performance at low disease prevalence. In clinical datasets, SIPW and SIPW-B were consistent with existing methods. The new methods also improve upon IPB by allowing full data restoration. Although the methods are computationally demanding at present, this limitation is expected to become less important as computing power continues to increase.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0321440
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partial verification bias correction using scaled inverse probability resampling for binary diagnostic tests

Umi Kalsom Yusof, Wan Nor Arifin
PLoS ONE
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
article

Partial verification bias correction using scaled inverse probability resampling for binary diagnostic tests

Umi Kalsom Yusof, Wan Nor Arifin
article en

Abstract

Diagnostic accuracy studies are crucial for evaluating new tests before their clinical application. These tests are compared with gold standard tests, and accuracy measures such as sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) are often calculated. However, these studies frequently suffer from partial verification bias (PVB) due to selective verification of patients, which leads to biased accuracy estimates. Among the methods for correcting PVB under the missing-at-random assumption for binary diagnostic tests, a bootstrap-based method known as the inverse probability bootstrap (IPB) was proposed. IPB demonstrated low bias for estimating Sn and Sp, but exhibited higher standard errors (SE) than other PVB correction methods and only corrected the distribution of the verified portion of the PVB data. This paper introduces two new methods to address these limitations: scaled inverse probability weighted resampling (SIPW) and scaled inverse probability weighted balanced resampling (SIPW-B), both built upon IPB. Using simulated and clinical datasets, SIPW and SIPW-B were compared against IPB and other existing methods (Begg and Greenes', inverse probability weighting estimator, and multiple imputation). For the simulated data sets, different combinations of disease prevalence (0.4 and 0.1), Sn (0.3 to 0.9), Sp (0.6 and 0.9), and sample sizes (200 and 1000) were generated. Two commonly used clinical datasets in PVB correction studies were also used. Performance was evaluated using bias and SE for the simulated data. Simulation results showed that both new methods outperformed IPB by producing lower bias and SE for Sn and Sp estimation, showing results comparable to existing methods, and demonstrating good performance at low disease prevalence. In clinical datasets, SIPW and SIPW-B were consistent with existing methods. The new methods also improve upon IPB by allowing full data restoration. Although the methods are computationally demanding at present, this limitation is expected to become less important as computing power continues to increase.

PLoS ONEVol. 20(9)
Universiti Sains Malaysia (MY), Sultan Abdul Halim Mu'adzam Shah International Islamic University (MY)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Statistical Methods and Inference
2.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.