GalileoÓ?s reasons between science, technology, and epistemology

Background: Galileo’s Dialogo offers the opportunity to follow the conceptual change that led Galileo to transform from a Ptolemaic to a Copernican. This shift involved a re-evaluation of how scientific knowledge is understood to originate. Objectives: This paper analyzes Galileo’s Dialogo to trace this conceptual change from Ptolemaic to Copernican views. A primary objective is to outline Galileo’s resulting epistemological conception, specifically how he rethought the traditional empiricist image for explaining the genesis of science. Method: The analysis is grounded in a hermeneutic-internalist reading of Galileo’s Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Results: In outlining his conceptual change, Galileo emphasizes how the traditional empiricist image to explain the genesis of science is to be rethought and replaced with an epistemological conception by virtue of which our theories must “do violence to sense” in order to build theories based on an assumption ex suppositione Conclusion: For Galileo, too, the role and function of experience remain decisive, but for him only experimental experience can determine whether a theoretical prediction is correct or incorrect.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bioethics Update
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24875/bup.25000008
Primary Topic
Historical Studies in Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GalileoÓ?s reasons between science, technology, and epistemology

Fabio Minazzi
Bioethics Update
Historical Studies in Science
article

GalileoÓ?s reasons between science, technology, and epistemology

Fabio Minazzi
article en

Abstract

Background: Galileo’s Dialogo offers the opportunity to follow the conceptual change that led Galileo to transform from a Ptolemaic to a Copernican. This shift involved a re-evaluation of how scientific knowledge is understood to originate. Objectives: This paper analyzes Galileo’s Dialogo to trace this conceptual change from Ptolemaic to Copernican views. A primary objective is to outline Galileo’s resulting epistemological conception, specifically how he rethought the traditional empiricist image for explaining the genesis of science. Method: The analysis is grounded in a hermeneutic-internalist reading of Galileo’s Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. Results: In outlining his conceptual change, Galileo emphasizes how the traditional empiricist image to explain the genesis of science is to be rethought and replaced with an epistemological conception by virtue of which our theories must “do violence to sense” in order to build theories based on an assumption ex suppositione Conclusion: For Galileo, too, the role and function of experience remain decisive, but for him only experimental experience can determine whether a theoretical prediction is correct or incorrect.

Bioethics UpdateVol. 11(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Historical Studies in Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.