Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Stone Clearance and Complications in Renal Stones Measuring 2 to 3.5 Centimeters: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS)

Background Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are the two most commonly used minimally invasive surgical techniques for renal stone disease, which is a major worldwide health burden. Because it is less intrusive, RIRS has become more common even though PCNL is still the gold standard for big renal stones. Clinical decision-making regarding the best intervention requires the use of comparative evidence. Objective To evaluate the perioperative results and stone-free rates of PCNL and RIRS in patients with kidney stones. Methodology In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients with kidney stones (2-3.5 cm; n=440) were split evenly between two groups: PCNL (n=220) and RIRS (n=220). The following outcomes were evaluated: perioperative problems, hospital stay, operation time, stone-free rate, and auxiliary procedures. Independent t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables were used in the statistical analysis; p<0.05 was deemed significant. Results The PCNL group had a significantly higher stone-free rate than the RIRS group (90.0% vs. 80.0%, χ²=8.57, p=0.003). The mean operative time was longer in the PCNL group compared to RIRS (92.4 ± 18.5 vs. 78.6 ± 15.3 min, t=8.42, p<0.001). The mean hospital stay was also longer for PCNL (3.6 ± 1.2 vs. 1.8 ± 0.7 days, t=18.7, p<0.001). Patients undergoing PCNL experienced greater intraoperative bleeding (17.3% vs. 2.7%, χ²=26.9, p<0.001) and a higher mean hemoglobin drop (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 0.7 ± 0.5 g/dl, t=13.1, p<0.001). Auxiliary procedure rates were higher in the RIRS group (20.0% vs. 10.0%, χ²=8.57, p=0.003). Conclusion Although PCNL provides better stone removal than RIRS, it is linked to longer operating times, longer hospital stays, and higher incidence of complications. Individualized treatment should be chosen according to the patient's and the stone's characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.93302
Primary Topic
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Stone Clearance and Complications in Renal Stones Measuring 2 to 3.5 Centimeters: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS)

Yassar Hussain Patujo, Mohammed Rafique Moosa, Shakeel Haseeb Uddin Siddique, Ayesha Masood et al.
Cureus
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
article

Prospective Comparative Evaluation of Stone Clearance and Complications in Renal Stones Measuring 2 to 3.5 Centimeters: Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS)

Yassar Hussain Patujo, Mohammed Rafique Moosa, Shakeel Haseeb Uddin Siddique, Ayesha Masood, Jahangir Sarwar Khan, Sajid Malik, M. Khan
article en

Abstract

Background Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) are the two most commonly used minimally invasive surgical techniques for renal stone disease, which is a major worldwide health burden. Because it is less intrusive, RIRS has become more common even though PCNL is still the gold standard for big renal stones. Clinical decision-making regarding the best intervention requires the use of comparative evidence. Objective To evaluate the perioperative results and stone-free rates of PCNL and RIRS in patients with kidney stones. Methodology In this prospective randomized controlled trial, patients with kidney stones (2-3.5 cm; n=440) were split evenly between two groups: PCNL (n=220) and RIRS (n=220). The following outcomes were evaluated: perioperative problems, hospital stay, operation time, stone-free rate, and auxiliary procedures. Independent t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square tests for categorical variables were used in the statistical analysis; p<0.05 was deemed significant. Results The PCNL group had a significantly higher stone-free rate than the RIRS group (90.0% vs. 80.0%, χ²=8.57, p=0.003). The mean operative time was longer in the PCNL group compared to RIRS (92.4 ± 18.5 vs. 78.6 ± 15.3 min, t=8.42, p<0.001). The mean hospital stay was also longer for PCNL (3.6 ± 1.2 vs. 1.8 ± 0.7 days, t=18.7, p<0.001). Patients undergoing PCNL experienced greater intraoperative bleeding (17.3% vs. 2.7%, χ²=26.9, p<0.001) and a higher mean hemoglobin drop (1.6 ± 0.8 vs. 0.7 ± 0.5 g/dl, t=13.1, p<0.001). Auxiliary procedure rates were higher in the RIRS group (20.0% vs. 10.0%, χ²=8.57, p=0.003). Conclusion Although PCNL provides better stone removal than RIRS, it is linked to longer operating times, longer hospital stays, and higher incidence of complications. Individualized treatment should be chosen according to the patient's and the stone's characteristics.

CureusVol. 17(9)
Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PK), Khyber Teaching Hospital (PK), Hayatabad Medical Complex (PK), Chandka Medical College (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Kidney Centre (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.