Investigating orientation adaptation following naturalistic film viewing

Humans display marked changes to their perceptual experience of a stimulus following prolonged or repeated exposure to a preceding stimulus. A well-studied example of such perceptual adaptation is the tilt-aftereffect. Here, prolonged exposure to one orientation leads to a shift in the perception of subsequent orientations. Such a capacity to adapt suggests the tuning of the visual system can change over time in response to our current visual environment. However, it remains unclear to what extent adaptation occurs in response to statistical regularities of features present in naturalistic scenes, such as oriented contrast. We therefore investigated orientation adaptation in response to natural viewing of filtered live-action film stimuli. Within a session, participants freely viewed 45 min of a film which had been filtered to include increased contrast energy within a specified orientation band (0°, 45°, 90°, or 135°; i.e., the adaptor). To measure adaptation effects, the film was intermittently interrupted to have participants perform a simple orientation judgement task. Having participants complete behavioural trials throughout the testing session, including 45 min of total adaptation time, allowed investigation of the accumulation of response biases and changes in such biases over the course of the session. We found very little evidence of adaptation across our conditions. Indeed, in the very few conditions where significant adaptation was observed, these effects were much weaker than those observed under typical tilt-aftereffect paradigms. Further, within a single session, we observed inconsistent development of adaptation effects. The current findings therefore suggest very minimal and, where present, inconsistent effects of adaptation in response to naturalistic viewing conditions. The divergence of our results from those predicted by prior studies using minimalistic studies, and suggests consideration of further barriers to understanding perceptual adaptation as experienced in nature are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-21383-x
Primary Topic
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating orientation adaptation following naturalistic film viewing

Jason B. Mattingley, Emily J. A-Izzeddin, Reuben Rideaux, William J. Harrison
Scientific Reports
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
article

Investigating orientation adaptation following naturalistic film viewing

Jason B. Mattingley, Emily J. A-Izzeddin, Reuben Rideaux, William J. Harrison
article en

Abstract

Humans display marked changes to their perceptual experience of a stimulus following prolonged or repeated exposure to a preceding stimulus. A well-studied example of such perceptual adaptation is the tilt-aftereffect. Here, prolonged exposure to one orientation leads to a shift in the perception of subsequent orientations. Such a capacity to adapt suggests the tuning of the visual system can change over time in response to our current visual environment. However, it remains unclear to what extent adaptation occurs in response to statistical regularities of features present in naturalistic scenes, such as oriented contrast. We therefore investigated orientation adaptation in response to natural viewing of filtered live-action film stimuli. Within a session, participants freely viewed 45 min of a film which had been filtered to include increased contrast energy within a specified orientation band (0°, 45°, 90°, or 135°; i.e., the adaptor). To measure adaptation effects, the film was intermittently interrupted to have participants perform a simple orientation judgement task. Having participants complete behavioural trials throughout the testing session, including 45 min of total adaptation time, allowed investigation of the accumulation of response biases and changes in such biases over the course of the session. We found very little evidence of adaptation across our conditions. Indeed, in the very few conditions where significant adaptation was observed, these effects were much weaker than those observed under typical tilt-aftereffect paradigms. Further, within a single session, we observed inconsistent development of adaptation effects. The current findings therefore suggest very minimal and, where present, inconsistent effects of adaptation in response to naturalistic viewing conditions. The divergence of our results from those predicted by prior studies using minimalistic studies, and suggests consideration of further barriers to understanding perceptual adaptation as experienced in nature are needed.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE), Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg (DE), Universities of Giessen and Marburg Lung Center (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Visual perception and processing mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.