The State of LGBQ+ Support: Correlates, Predictors, and Congregational Moderators of a National Sample of US Religious Leaders

Abstract Introduction While a growing body of literature has sought to understand factors connected to LGBQ+ acceptance and support by religious individuals , these factors remain understudied in religious leaders . Extant findings on LGBQ+ support among non-religious and even religious individuals may not directly apply to religious leaders, given the leaders’ unique roles as religious and spiritual authorities. Methods Using a nationally representative sample of religious leaders from the 2020 National Survey of Religious Leaders ( N = 1600), we tested preregistered hypotheses to examine overall levels of LGBQ+ support and psychosocial, religious, and spiritual correlates, as well as potential congregational moderators. Results Results reveal overall low LGBQ+ support among US religious leaders, with psychosocial factors (e.g., identifying as White, woman, higher education, income) and religious/spiritual struggles associated with greater support, while greater religious fundamentalism and prayer are associated with lower support. Religious fundamentalism emerged as the strongest predictor of lower LGBQ+ support across all analyses. Although congregation size did not moderate this relationship, congregational racial composition and religious tradition did influence the strength of the fundamentalism and LGBQ+ support association. Policy Implications Religious leaders represent a key stakeholder group in the pursuit of increased rights and support for LGBQ+ people, yet this study reveals a significant disconnect between their attitudes and broader population trends toward acceptance. Community and policy stakeholders should collaborate with religious institutions, denominations, and theological seminaries to promote interpretive frameworks that encourage theological nuance, which emerged as the primary barrier to LGBQ+ support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-025-01192-7
Citations
1
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.44

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The State of LGBQ+ Support: Correlates, Predictors, and Congregational Moderators of a National Sample of US Religious Leaders

Seungju Kim, Weiman Xu
1 citations
Sexuality Research and Social Policy
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
article

The State of LGBQ+ Support: Correlates, Predictors, and Congregational Moderators of a National Sample of US Religious Leaders

Seungju Kim, Weiman Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction While a growing body of literature has sought to understand factors connected to LGBQ+ acceptance and support by religious individuals , these factors remain understudied in religious leaders . Extant findings on LGBQ+ support among non-religious and even religious individuals may not directly apply to religious leaders, given the leaders’ unique roles as religious and spiritual authorities. Methods Using a nationally representative sample of religious leaders from the 2020 National Survey of Religious Leaders ( N = 1600), we tested preregistered hypotheses to examine overall levels of LGBQ+ support and psychosocial, religious, and spiritual correlates, as well as potential congregational moderators. Results Results reveal overall low LGBQ+ support among US religious leaders, with psychosocial factors (e.g., identifying as White, woman, higher education, income) and religious/spiritual struggles associated with greater support, while greater religious fundamentalism and prayer are associated with lower support. Religious fundamentalism emerged as the strongest predictor of lower LGBQ+ support across all analyses. Although congregation size did not moderate this relationship, congregational racial composition and religious tradition did influence the strength of the fundamentalism and LGBQ+ support association. Policy Implications Religious leaders represent a key stakeholder group in the pursuit of increased rights and support for LGBQ+ people, yet this study reveals a significant disconnect between their attitudes and broader population trends toward acceptance. Community and policy stakeholders should collaborate with religious institutions, denominations, and theological seminaries to promote interpretive frameworks that encourage theological nuance, which emerged as the primary barrier to LGBQ+ support.

Sexuality Research and Social Policy
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
National Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
2.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.