International Investment Instruments for Community Crisis Management with Environmental Considerations

The growing environmental risks and their destructive impact on the socio-economic development of communities make this topic highly relevant, requiring a fundamental rethink of crisis management approaches. This study aims to improve the scientific and methodological principles of organising crisis management measures in local communities by taking the environmental component into account. Principles of ecosystem analysis were applied to understand the relationships between environmental, economic, and social aspects of crisis management. Structural and functional analysis was employed to systematise crisis management tools. A comparative analysis of international experience in attracting investment resources for environmental projects was also conducted. The main hypothesis assumes that integrating the environmental component into all stages of crisis management increases communities' resilience to crises. The research methodology included analysing statistical data from international organisations on environmental disasters and their consequences. Systematisation and classification methods were employed to develop a typology of anti-crisis management tools. Comparative analysis methods were employed to study international experience. A critical analysis of international financial instruments for environmental projects was also conducted. Five principles of crisis management were formulated: prevention; systematicity; participation; adaptability; and sustainability. A model of anti-crisis management incorporating an environmental component was developed. Tools for implementing crisis measures were categorised into four groups: organisational, financial and economic, informational, and technological. Key international investment instruments for financing environmentally oriented programmes were identified. The theoretical significance lies in expanding scientific knowledge on integrating environmental aspects into crisis management theory. In practice, the developed approaches can be used by local governments to increase resilience to environmental crises. The study's scientific novelty lies in developing a comprehensive crisis management system with an integrated environmental component, and in systematising international investment instruments. Prospects for further research include developing a system of performance indicators and creating models for assessing the investment attractiveness of environmental projects. However, the study is limited by an insufficient analysis of institutional barriers to implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Проблеми сучасних трансформацій Серія економіка та управління
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54929/2786-5738-2025-21-06-01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Investment Instruments for Community Crisis Management with Environmental Considerations

Natalia Skorobogatova
1 citations
Проблеми сучасних трансформацій Серія економіка та управління
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.20
article

International Investment Instruments for Community Crisis Management with Environmental Considerations

Natalia Skorobogatova
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The growing environmental risks and their destructive impact on the socio-economic development of communities make this topic highly relevant, requiring a fundamental rethink of crisis management approaches. This study aims to improve the scientific and methodological principles of organising crisis management measures in local communities by taking the environmental component into account. Principles of ecosystem analysis were applied to understand the relationships between environmental, economic, and social aspects of crisis management. Structural and functional analysis was employed to systematise crisis management tools. A comparative analysis of international experience in attracting investment resources for environmental projects was also conducted. The main hypothesis assumes that integrating the environmental component into all stages of crisis management increases communities' resilience to crises. The research methodology included analysing statistical data from international organisations on environmental disasters and their consequences. Systematisation and classification methods were employed to develop a typology of anti-crisis management tools. Comparative analysis methods were employed to study international experience. A critical analysis of international financial instruments for environmental projects was also conducted. Five principles of crisis management were formulated: prevention; systematicity; participation; adaptability; and sustainability. A model of anti-crisis management incorporating an environmental component was developed. Tools for implementing crisis measures were categorised into four groups: organisational, financial and economic, informational, and technological. Key international investment instruments for financing environmentally oriented programmes were identified. The theoretical significance lies in expanding scientific knowledge on integrating environmental aspects into crisis management theory. In practice, the developed approaches can be used by local governments to increase resilience to environmental crises. The study's scientific novelty lies in developing a comprehensive crisis management system with an integrated environmental component, and in systematising international investment instruments. Prospects for further research include developing a system of performance indicators and creating models for assessing the investment attractiveness of environmental projects. However, the study is limited by an insufficient analysis of institutional barriers to implementation.

Проблеми сучасних трансформацій Серія економіка та управління(21)
National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute” (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disaster Management and Resilience
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.