Fostering Research Integrity through Training: The training materials of four EU-funded projects through the lens of pedagogical underpinnings and three taxonomies of learning

The analysis suggests that taxonomies are applicable to various pedagogical underpinnings and can help trainers to communicate the objectives of training and learners to relate their expectations to the objectives. We identify implications for training design and suggest recommendations for training developers. It is advisable to pay attention to learning objectives dedicated to foster the higher levels of learning and understanding. Less commonly applied taxonomies in the context of integrity training, such as the Taxonomy of Significant Learning can help to identify relevant learning objectives both for trainers as well as learners. Research cultures and disciplinary differences are generally not spelled out at the level of learning objectives highlighting the need to consider these explicitly in training implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.20826.1
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fostering Research Integrity through Training: The training materials of four EU-funded projects through the lens of pedagogical underpinnings and three taxonomies of learning

Panagiotis Kavouras, P. J. Wall, Anu Tammeleht, Dirk Lanzerath et al.
Open Research Europe
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

Fostering Research Integrity through Training: The training materials of four EU-funded projects through the lens of pedagogical underpinnings and three taxonomies of learning

Panagiotis Kavouras, P. J. Wall, Anu Tammeleht, Dirk Lanzerath, Erika Löfstrôm, Julia Prieß-Buchheit, Linda Zollitsch, Rita Santos, Tom Lindemann, Natalie Evans, F Blom, Mariëtte van den Hoven, Giulia Inguaggiato
article en

Abstract

The analysis suggests that taxonomies are applicable to various pedagogical underpinnings and can help trainers to communicate the objectives of training and learners to relate their expectations to the objectives. We identify implications for training design and suggest recommendations for training developers. It is advisable to pay attention to learning objectives dedicated to foster the higher levels of learning and understanding. Less commonly applied taxonomies in the context of integrity training, such as the Taxonomy of Significant Learning can help to identify relevant learning objectives both for trainers as well as learners. Research cultures and disciplinary differences are generally not spelled out at the level of learning objectives highlighting the need to consider these explicitly in training implementation.

Open Research EuropeVol. 5
University of Helsinki (FI), University of Bonn (DE), University of Oslo (NO), University of Luxembourg (LU), Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel (DE), Technological University Dublin (IE), Arbed (Luxembourg) (LU), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Tartu (EE), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.