Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the trapeziometacarpal arthrosis symptoms and disability questionnaire

BackgroundThe Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis Symptoms and Disability questionnaire (TASD) is widely used to assess symptoms and disability associated with trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis.ObjectiveTo adapt the TASD into Turkish (TASD-TR) and evaluate its reliability and validity.MethodsForty-one patients with TMC arthrosis were included in the study. Thumb function was assessed using the TASD-TR and the Thumb Disability Examination (TDX). Pain intensity was rated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Power grip strength (PGS) and pinch strength (PS) were measured using the Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer and Jamar Pinch Gauge, respectively.ResultsThe TASD-TR demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.786-0.859; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.844). TASD-TR Total score showed a high correlation with TDX Total score (r = 0.706) but weak correlations with PGS (r = -0.342), PS (r = -0.290), and VAS (r = 0.373) scores. The TASD-TR Disability subscale was highly correlated with both TDX Total (r = 0.882) and TDX-ADL (r = 0.877) scores, and the TASD-TR Symptoms subscale was moderately correlated with TDX Pain score (r = 0.508).ConclusionThe TASD-TR is a reliable and valid tool for assessing thumb symptoms and function in Turkish-speaking patients with TMC arthrosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127251381921
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the trapeziometacarpal arthrosis symptoms and disability questionnaire

Corey Weston McGee, Halil İbrahim Ergen, Tuba Maden, Mehmet Vakıf Keskinbıçkı et al.
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
article

Cross-cultural adaptation, validity, and reliability of the Turkish version of the trapeziometacarpal arthrosis symptoms and disability questionnaire

Corey Weston McGee, Halil İbrahim Ergen, Tuba Maden, Mehmet Vakıf Keskinbıçkı, Sedat Yiğit, Kübra Coşkun
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe Trapeziometacarpal Arthrosis Symptoms and Disability questionnaire (TASD) is widely used to assess symptoms and disability associated with trapeziometacarpal (TMC) arthrosis.ObjectiveTo adapt the TASD into Turkish (TASD-TR) and evaluate its reliability and validity.MethodsForty-one patients with TMC arthrosis were included in the study. Thumb function was assessed using the TASD-TR and the Thumb Disability Examination (TDX). Pain intensity was rated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Power grip strength (PGS) and pinch strength (PS) were measured using the Jamar Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer and Jamar Pinch Gauge, respectively.ResultsThe TASD-TR demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.786-0.859; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) = 0.844). TASD-TR Total score showed a high correlation with TDX Total score (r = 0.706) but weak correlations with PGS (r = -0.342), PS (r = -0.290), and VAS (r = 0.373) scores. The TASD-TR Disability subscale was highly correlated with both TDX Total (r = 0.882) and TDX-ADL (r = 0.877) scores, and the TASD-TR Symptoms subscale was moderately correlated with TDX Pain score (r = 0.508).ConclusionThe TASD-TR is a reliable and valid tool for assessing thumb symptoms and function in Turkish-speaking patients with TMC arthrosis.

Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal RehabilitationVol. 39(2)
American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (US), Gaziantep Children's Hospital (TR), University of Minnesota Medical Center (US), Hasan Kalyoncu University (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.