Intelligenz im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit

The steady rise of generative AI raises the question of what impact the technical reproducibility of intelligence has on our thinking in general and our understanding of reason in particular. There are different opinions on the question whether AI can develop something like a humanoid consciousness and whether it represents an opportunity or a threat for the future. In this essay, I discuss this question with reference to the dialectic of (self-)consciousness as laid out by Hegel in his philosophy of mind and subjective spirit. I will examine the thesis that artificial intelligence represents the consequent further development of what Hegel called “verständiges Denken”. Building on Max Horkheimer’s critique of instrumental reason and Walter Benjamin’s concept of technological reproducibility of art, I will outline the commonalities and differences between natural and artificial intelligence, taking into account contemporary debates about the potential consciousness of AI or AGI. I will show that the dialectical ambiguity of the former continues in the latter and that emancipatory and totalitarian tendencies go hand in hand in both. In contrast to current approaches, which usually view AI from a subject-centered perspective of cognitive science or action theory, a systemic-dialectical concept of AI based on social interactivity can enable a critical position that does not play natural and artificial intelligence off against each other, but recognizes the emancipatory potential in both and helps to protect both from the danger of totalitarian thinking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Hegelianos.
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70244/reh.v22i40.541
Primary Topic
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligenz im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit

Alexander F. Schubert
Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Hegelianos.
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
article

Intelligenz im Zeitalter ihrer technischen Reproduzierbarkeit

Alexander F. Schubert
article en

Abstract

The steady rise of generative AI raises the question of what impact the technical reproducibility of intelligence has on our thinking in general and our understanding of reason in particular. There are different opinions on the question whether AI can develop something like a humanoid consciousness and whether it represents an opportunity or a threat for the future. In this essay, I discuss this question with reference to the dialectic of (self-)consciousness as laid out by Hegel in his philosophy of mind and subjective spirit. I will examine the thesis that artificial intelligence represents the consequent further development of what Hegel called “verständiges Denken”. Building on Max Horkheimer’s critique of instrumental reason and Walter Benjamin’s concept of technological reproducibility of art, I will outline the commonalities and differences between natural and artificial intelligence, taking into account contemporary debates about the potential consciousness of AI or AGI. I will show that the dialectical ambiguity of the former continues in the latter and that emancipatory and totalitarian tendencies go hand in hand in both. In contrast to current approaches, which usually view AI from a subject-centered perspective of cognitive science or action theory, a systemic-dialectical concept of AI based on social interactivity can enable a critical position that does not play natural and artificial intelligence off against each other, but recognizes the emancipatory potential in both and helps to protect both from the danger of totalitarian thinking.

Revista Eletrônica de Estudos Hegelianos.Vol. 22(40)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Cybernetics and Technology in Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.