Computer vision-based approaches to cattle identification: A comparative evaluation of body texture, QR code, and numerical labelling

<br />Cattle identification systems are advancing tomeet the growing demands ofprecision livestock management, traceability, and ethical animal treatment. This study investigates three methods: body texture recognition, QR code collars, and numerical labelling, implemented using the YOLOv8 convolutional neural network. Each method was evaluated interms ofaccuracy, scalability, adaptability todynamic herd changes, and operational efficiency under various environmental conditions. Body texture recognition, while leveraging unique natural patterns and achieving amean Average Precision (mAP50–95) of0.78 proved limited byits reliance onfrequent dataset retraining toaccommodate changes inherd composition and susceptibility tomisidentification inlarger herds. QRcode collars demonstrated adaptability indynamic herds byenabling pre-trained convolutional neural networks toassign reserved codes tonew animals without retraining, while removing animals involves simply deleting their codes from the system. This approach also achieved anmAP50–95 of0.71, which was lower than the body texture-based approach, but offered greater flexibility in herd management. Despite this adaptability, this method demonstrated significant challenges inreal-world environments. Occlusion caused byfeeders, barriers, oranimal movements, along with low-resolution imaging and poor lighting conditions, can compromise detection accuracy, particularly inlarger herds with obstructive barn layouts. The numerical labelling method emerged asthe most effective solution todynamic cattle identification, achieving the highest mAP50–95 of0.84. Itprovided ascalable and highly accurate approach that integrates seamlessly with automated systems. Unlike traditional body marking techniques such asear notching and branding, numerical labelling isless invasive, painless, and highly scalable, aligning with ethical livestock management practices while maintaining consistent accuracy across diverse environmental conditions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Czech Journal of Animal Science
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17221/66/2025-cjas
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Food Supply Chain Traceability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Computer vision-based approaches to cattle identification: A comparative evaluation of body texture, QR code, and numerical labelling

Roman Bumbálek, Radim Stehlík, Zbyněk Havelka, Petr Bartoš et al.
3 citations
Czech Journal of Animal Science
Food Supply Chain Traceability
3.49
article

Computer vision-based approaches to cattle identification: A comparative evaluation of body texture, QR code, and numerical labelling

Roman Bumbálek, Radim Stehlík, Zbyněk Havelka, Petr Bartoš, Tomáš Zoubek, Radim Kuneš, Jean de Dieu Marcel Ufitikirezi, Sandra Nicole Umurungi
article en
3 citations

Abstract

<br />Cattle identification systems are advancing tomeet the growing demands ofprecision livestock management, traceability, and ethical animal treatment. This study investigates three methods: body texture recognition, QR code collars, and numerical labelling, implemented using the YOLOv8 convolutional neural network. Each method was evaluated interms ofaccuracy, scalability, adaptability todynamic herd changes, and operational efficiency under various environmental conditions. Body texture recognition, while leveraging unique natural patterns and achieving amean Average Precision (mAP50–95) of0.78 proved limited byits reliance onfrequent dataset retraining toaccommodate changes inherd composition and susceptibility tomisidentification inlarger herds. QRcode collars demonstrated adaptability indynamic herds byenabling pre-trained convolutional neural networks toassign reserved codes tonew animals without retraining, while removing animals involves simply deleting their codes from the system. This approach also achieved anmAP50–95 of0.71, which was lower than the body texture-based approach, but offered greater flexibility in herd management. Despite this adaptability, this method demonstrated significant challenges inreal-world environments. Occlusion caused byfeeders, barriers, oranimal movements, along with low-resolution imaging and poor lighting conditions, can compromise detection accuracy, particularly inlarger herds with obstructive barn layouts. The numerical labelling method emerged asthe most effective solution todynamic cattle identification, achieving the highest mAP50–95 of0.84. Itprovided ascalable and highly accurate approach that integrates seamlessly with automated systems. Unlike traditional body marking techniques such asear notching and branding, numerical labelling isless invasive, painless, and highly scalable, aligning with ethical livestock management practices while maintaining consistent accuracy across diverse environmental conditions.

Czech Journal of Animal ScienceVol. 70(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Food Supply Chain Traceability
3.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.