Ecodesign of Alternative Fish Crates through Multicriteria Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment

This study addresses the environmental impact of expanded polystyrene (EPS) crates used in small-scale fish supply chains by evaluating sustainable packaging alternatives through multicriteria analysis (MCA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), in alignment with ISO standards. Different materials and solutions were assessed based on fragmentation, recyclability, insulation, mechanical properties, food safety, and environmental impact, among others. The results highlight recycled EPS (rEPS) as the most environmentally friendly option, although fragmentation risks remain. Wooden crates with extruded/expanded polystyrene (XPS) trays and polypropylene (PP) crates balance durability and sustainability but face operational challenges, while cardboard-based and washable PP crates generate higher environmental impacts. The findings underscore the need for improved recyclability, closed-loop supply chains, and design enhancements to align with the principles of the circular economy, as well as reducing marine pollution and conserving resource consumption.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5c05340
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecodesign of Alternative Fish Crates through Multicriteria Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment

Sabrina Pricl, Andrea Mio, Anna Bortoluzzi, Emanuele Alberto Slejko et al.
ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Ecodesign of Alternative Fish Crates through Multicriteria Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment

Sabrina Pricl, Andrea Mio, Anna Bortoluzzi, Emanuele Alberto Slejko, Daniel Borgobello
article en

Abstract

This study addresses the environmental impact of expanded polystyrene (EPS) crates used in small-scale fish supply chains by evaluating sustainable packaging alternatives through multicriteria analysis (MCA) and life cycle assessment (LCA), in alignment with ISO standards. Different materials and solutions were assessed based on fragmentation, recyclability, insulation, mechanical properties, food safety, and environmental impact, among others. The results highlight recycled EPS (rEPS) as the most environmentally friendly option, although fragmentation risks remain. Wooden crates with extruded/expanded polystyrene (XPS) trays and polypropylene (PP) crates balance durability and sustainability but face operational challenges, while cardboard-based and washable PP crates generate higher environmental impacts. The findings underscore the need for improved recyclability, closed-loop supply chains, and design enhancements to align with the principles of the circular economy, as well as reducing marine pollution and conserving resource consumption.

ACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringVol. 13(40)
University of Trieste (IT), University of Łódź (PL), Institute of Materials for Electronics and Magnetism (IT), WWF Italia (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ecodesign of Alternative Fish Crates through Multicriteria Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment — Sabrina Pricl, Andrea Mio, et al. · ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS