Hybrid Dynamic Programming Healthcare Cloud-Based Quality of Service Optimization

The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) with cloud computing has revolutionized healthcare systems, offering scalable and real-time patient monitoring. However, optimizing response times and energy consumption remains crucial for efficient healthcare delivery. This research evaluates various algorithmic approaches for workload migration and resource management within IoT cloud-based healthcare systems. The performance of the implemented algorithm in this research, Hybrid Dynamic Programming and Long Short-Term Memory (Hybrid DP+LSTM), was analyzed against other six key algorithms, namely Gradient Optimization with Back Propagation to Input (GOBI), Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), improved GOBI (GOBI2), Predictive Offloading for Network Devices (POND), Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP), and Genetic Algorithm (GA) based on their average response time and energy consumption. Hybrid DP+LSTM achieves the lowest response time (82.91ms) with an energy consumption of 2,835,048 joules per container. The outcome of the analysis showed that Hybrid DP+LSTM have significant response times improvement, with percentage increases of 89.3%, 79.0%, 83.8%, 97.0%, 99.8%, and 99.94% against GOBI, GOBI2, DRL, POND, MILP, and GA, respectively. In terms of energy consumption, Hybrid DP+LSTM outperforms other approaches, with GOBI2 (3,664,337 joules) consuming 29.3% more energy, DRL (2,973,238 joules) consuming 4.9% more, GOBI (4,463,010 joules) consuming 57.4% more, POND (3,310,966 joules) consuming 16.8% more, MILP (3,005,498 joules) consuming 6.0% more, and the GA (3,959,935 joules) consuming 39.7% more. The result of ablation of the Hybrid DP+LSTM model achieves a 47.05% improvement over DP-only (156.57ms) and a 70.64% improvement over LSTM-only (282.41ms) in response time. On the energy efficiency side, Hybrid DP+LSTM shows 22.80% improvement over LSTM-only (3,671,51 joules), but 7.34% underperformance compared to DP-only (2,640,93). These research findings indicate that the Hybrid DP+LSTM technique provides the best trade-off between response time and energy efficiency. Future research should further explore hybrid approaches to optimize these metrics in IoT cloud-based healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computing Theories and Applications
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62411/jcta.14455
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Dynamic Programming Healthcare Cloud-Based Quality of Service Optimization

Martins E. Irhebhude, Abraham E. Evwiekpaefe, Nengak Iliya Sitlong
1 citations
Journal of Computing Theories and Applications
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.94
article

Hybrid Dynamic Programming Healthcare Cloud-Based Quality of Service Optimization

Martins E. Irhebhude, Abraham E. Evwiekpaefe, Nengak Iliya Sitlong
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) with cloud computing has revolutionized healthcare systems, offering scalable and real-time patient monitoring. However, optimizing response times and energy consumption remains crucial for efficient healthcare delivery. This research evaluates various algorithmic approaches for workload migration and resource management within IoT cloud-based healthcare systems. The performance of the implemented algorithm in this research, Hybrid Dynamic Programming and Long Short-Term Memory (Hybrid DP+LSTM), was analyzed against other six key algorithms, namely Gradient Optimization with Back Propagation to Input (GOBI), Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), improved GOBI (GOBI2), Predictive Offloading for Network Devices (POND), Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP), and Genetic Algorithm (GA) based on their average response time and energy consumption. Hybrid DP+LSTM achieves the lowest response time (82.91ms) with an energy consumption of 2,835,048 joules per container. The outcome of the analysis showed that Hybrid DP+LSTM have significant response times improvement, with percentage increases of 89.3%, 79.0%, 83.8%, 97.0%, 99.8%, and 99.94% against GOBI, GOBI2, DRL, POND, MILP, and GA, respectively. In terms of energy consumption, Hybrid DP+LSTM outperforms other approaches, with GOBI2 (3,664,337 joules) consuming 29.3% more energy, DRL (2,973,238 joules) consuming 4.9% more, GOBI (4,463,010 joules) consuming 57.4% more, POND (3,310,966 joules) consuming 16.8% more, MILP (3,005,498 joules) consuming 6.0% more, and the GA (3,959,935 joules) consuming 39.7% more. The result of ablation of the Hybrid DP+LSTM model achieves a 47.05% improvement over DP-only (156.57ms) and a 70.64% improvement over LSTM-only (282.41ms) in response time. On the energy efficiency side, Hybrid DP+LSTM shows 22.80% improvement over LSTM-only (3,671,51 joules), but 7.34% underperformance compared to DP-only (2,640,93). These research findings indicate that the Hybrid DP+LSTM technique provides the best trade-off between response time and energy efficiency. Future research should further explore hybrid approaches to optimize these metrics in IoT cloud-based healthcare systems.

Journal of Computing Theories and ApplicationsVol. 3(2)
Nigerian Defence Academy (NG), Federal College of Education, Kano (NG), University of Education (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
2.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.