B – 40 Identifying Executive Function Impairment in Current and Former Military Special Operators

Abstract Objective United States military special operators are exposed to training and missions in extreme conditions highly demanding of higher-level executive skills, such as planning, organization, problem-solving, rapid decision making, and inhibitory control. Injuries sustained in such conditions can affect those executive skills, as well as their physical and psychological functioning. We applied algorithms for identifying executive function impairment in military special operators undergoing neuropsychological evaluations. Method Algorithms were derived from 1,028 individuals between the ages of 16 and 89 from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) standardization sample. Tests included seven primary scores derived from Letter Fluency, Category Fluency, Category Fluency Switching, Trail Making Test Part 4, and Color Word Inhibition subtests. The algorithms for defining executive function impairment were applied to 57 current and former military special operators undergoing a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Results Most special operators (70.2%) self-reported having significant executive function problems over the past year. Having three or more executive function scores ≤16th percentile (scaled score [SS]≤7) occurred in 18.7% of the D-KEFS normative sample and 3.5% of the military special operators. Having three or more executive function scores ≤9th percentile (SS≤6) occurred in 11.4% of the D-KEFS normative sample compared to 3.5% of the military special operators. Conclusion Subjectively experienced executive function problems were very common, but objectively measured executive function impairment was very uncommon, in military special operators undergoing neuropsychological evaluations. Targeting modifiable factors for treatment and rehabilitation might lead to improved cognitive functioning and quality of life.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.191
Primary Topic
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

B – 40 Identifying Executive Function Impairment in Current and Former Military Special Operators

Grant L. Iverson, James A. Holdnack, Alicia Kissinger-Knox
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
article

B – 40 Identifying Executive Function Impairment in Current and Former Military Special Operators

Grant L. Iverson, James A. Holdnack, Alicia Kissinger-Knox
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective United States military special operators are exposed to training and missions in extreme conditions highly demanding of higher-level executive skills, such as planning, organization, problem-solving, rapid decision making, and inhibitory control. Injuries sustained in such conditions can affect those executive skills, as well as their physical and psychological functioning. We applied algorithms for identifying executive function impairment in military special operators undergoing neuropsychological evaluations. Method Algorithms were derived from 1,028 individuals between the ages of 16 and 89 from the Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) standardization sample. Tests included seven primary scores derived from Letter Fluency, Category Fluency, Category Fluency Switching, Trail Making Test Part 4, and Color Word Inhibition subtests. The algorithms for defining executive function impairment were applied to 57 current and former military special operators undergoing a clinical neuropsychological evaluation. Results Most special operators (70.2%) self-reported having significant executive function problems over the past year. Having three or more executive function scores ≤16th percentile (scaled score [SS]≤7) occurred in 18.7% of the D-KEFS normative sample and 3.5% of the military special operators. Having three or more executive function scores ≤9th percentile (SS≤6) occurred in 11.4% of the D-KEFS normative sample compared to 3.5% of the military special operators. Conclusion Subjectively experienced executive function problems were very common, but objectively measured executive function impairment was very uncommon, in military special operators undergoing neuropsychological evaluations. Targeting modifiable factors for treatment and rehabilitation might lead to improved cognitive functioning and quality of life.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.