Integrating insights into radicalization: A text‐mining systematic review

Abstract The study of radicalization encompasses a broad spectrum of perspectives, with scholars from diverse disciplines – ranging from psychology, sociology, political science, criminology, to economics – contributing to its multifaceted comprehension. Despite this substantial body of empirical research, the knowledge is fragmented across disciplines, emphasizing the need for integration to establish a cohesive framework. As laying the groundwork for a unified framework begins with identifying relevant phenomena, this systematic review analyzed 4019 research articles using text mining to detect phenomena associated with radicalization. Author keywords and abstracts were analyzed by examining term frequency as an indicator of relevance and term co‐occurrence as an indicator of association. The results reflect themes commonly featured in theory, such as ideology, identity, and social networks, but also identified themes not well developed in theory. Macro‐level phenomena, including the role of the state, economy, elections, policy, and regional factors, as well as micro‐ and meso‐level phenomena like the internet, social media, adolescence, personality, language, education, and mental health, are not sufficiently embedded in theory. The findings further provide the first empirical evidence confirming the fragmentation of research on radicalization. This review represents a crucial step toward synthesizing existing knowledge and advancing a unified understanding of radicalization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Psychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.70070
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating insights into radicalization: A text‐mining systematic review

Anna Knorr, Nikita Podolin-Danner, Małgorzata Kossowska, Gabriele Di Cicco
1 citations
Political Psychology
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
article

Integrating insights into radicalization: A text‐mining systematic review

Anna Knorr, Nikita Podolin-Danner, Małgorzata Kossowska, Gabriele Di Cicco
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract The study of radicalization encompasses a broad spectrum of perspectives, with scholars from diverse disciplines – ranging from psychology, sociology, political science, criminology, to economics – contributing to its multifaceted comprehension. Despite this substantial body of empirical research, the knowledge is fragmented across disciplines, emphasizing the need for integration to establish a cohesive framework. As laying the groundwork for a unified framework begins with identifying relevant phenomena, this systematic review analyzed 4019 research articles using text mining to detect phenomena associated with radicalization. Author keywords and abstracts were analyzed by examining term frequency as an indicator of relevance and term co‐occurrence as an indicator of association. The results reflect themes commonly featured in theory, such as ideology, identity, and social networks, but also identified themes not well developed in theory. Macro‐level phenomena, including the role of the state, economy, elections, policy, and regional factors, as well as micro‐ and meso‐level phenomena like the internet, social media, adolescence, personality, language, education, and mental health, are not sufficiently embedded in theory. The findings further provide the first empirical evidence confirming the fragmentation of research on radicalization. This review represents a crucial step toward synthesizing existing knowledge and advancing a unified understanding of radicalization.

Political Psychology
Jagiellonian University (PL), University of Vienna (AT), Complexity Science Hub (AT), Institute of Psychology (PL)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Integrating insights into radicalization: A text‐mining systematic review — Anna Knorr, Nikita Podolin-Danner, et al. · Political Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS