A data-driven typology of individually perceived workplace environments and employee well-being

This study adopts a data-driven, employee-centered approach to explore how individually perceived workplace environments shape well-being. Analyzing over 1.3 million observations from 2017 to 2021, we identify nine key job demand and resource factors-including workload, emotional burden, job autonomy, organizational integrity, and support-using factor analysis. Rather than examining these dimensions in isolation, we apply Gaussian mixture models (GMM) to uncover ten distinct workplace types that reflect co-occurring patterns of demands and resources as experienced by individual employees, ranging from Grade D (least favorable) to Grade A1 (most favorable). Our findings reveal substantial variation in employee well-being-including mental health, work engagement, job satisfaction, and workplace cohesiveness-across these clusters. We further examine how changes in workplace type over time relate to changes in individual well-being, highlighting the importance of dynamic and subjective workplace conditions. By centering the employee perspective and identifying lived patterns of workplace experience, this study offers novel insights into workplace dynamics and supports more responsive, employee-oriented organizational policies and practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-18332-z
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A data-driven typology of individually perceived workplace environments and employee well-being

Shunsuke Managi, Xiangdan Piao, Jun Xie
Scientific Reports
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

A data-driven typology of individually perceived workplace environments and employee well-being

Shunsuke Managi, Xiangdan Piao, Jun Xie
article en

Abstract

This study adopts a data-driven, employee-centered approach to explore how individually perceived workplace environments shape well-being. Analyzing over 1.3 million observations from 2017 to 2021, we identify nine key job demand and resource factors-including workload, emotional burden, job autonomy, organizational integrity, and support-using factor analysis. Rather than examining these dimensions in isolation, we apply Gaussian mixture models (GMM) to uncover ten distinct workplace types that reflect co-occurring patterns of demands and resources as experienced by individual employees, ranging from Grade D (least favorable) to Grade A1 (most favorable). Our findings reveal substantial variation in employee well-being-including mental health, work engagement, job satisfaction, and workplace cohesiveness-across these clusters. We further examine how changes in workplace type over time relate to changes in individual well-being, highlighting the importance of dynamic and subjective workplace conditions. By centering the employee perspective and identifying lived patterns of workplace experience, this study offers novel insights into workplace dynamics and supports more responsive, employee-oriented organizational policies and practices.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Kyushu University (JP), Iwate University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A data-driven typology of individually perceived workplace environments and employee well-being — Shunsuke Managi, Xiangdan Piao, et al. · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS