Implementation of whole genome sequencing in cancer management: modelling and sensitivity analysis using system dynamics

Precision oncology using biomarkers and genomic testing facilitates individualised diagnosis and consequently treatment for cancer patients. Standard of Care is conducted through assays of biomarkers for treatment selection. However, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) provides excessively more information about actionable mutations and complex interventions. Despite its potentials in cancer management, WGS is restricted by its high cost and limited capacity. Implementing WGS is complex because it influences several elements of the care delivery and deals with the dynamic changes in supply, demand, technology, and cost. In this study, we use a System Dynamics (SD) model to evaluate WGS implementation. We also use the developed SD model to conduct sensitivity analysis to derive insights for decision-making on genomic testing scenarios. Various scenarios have been compared by the number of diagnosed patients and total cost. These scenarios have been created through alterations in WGS referral system, capacity, price, and willingness rate as well as testing time across different hospitals. The results showed that referring more patients for WGS will increase the number of diagnosed patients (by 30%), however it will impose more cost on the system (by 20%) due to higher cost of WGS. Therefore, investment strategies toward reducing cost of WGS as well as reimbursement policies can be beneficial to make WGS more economic and accessible. This study shows how the developed SD model can contribute to providing insights for policy makers in finding the optimal way for implementing WGS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Oncology
Published
2025-09-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12672-025-03705-7
Primary Topic
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of whole genome sequencing in cancer management: modelling and sensitivity analysis using system dynamics

Maarten J. IJzerman, Hadi Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Marzieh Soltanolkottabi
Discover Oncology
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
article

Implementation of whole genome sequencing in cancer management: modelling and sensitivity analysis using system dynamics

Maarten J. IJzerman, Hadi Akbarzadeh Khorshidi, Marzieh Soltanolkottabi
article en

Abstract

Precision oncology using biomarkers and genomic testing facilitates individualised diagnosis and consequently treatment for cancer patients. Standard of Care is conducted through assays of biomarkers for treatment selection. However, Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) provides excessively more information about actionable mutations and complex interventions. Despite its potentials in cancer management, WGS is restricted by its high cost and limited capacity. Implementing WGS is complex because it influences several elements of the care delivery and deals with the dynamic changes in supply, demand, technology, and cost. In this study, we use a System Dynamics (SD) model to evaluate WGS implementation. We also use the developed SD model to conduct sensitivity analysis to derive insights for decision-making on genomic testing scenarios. Various scenarios have been compared by the number of diagnosed patients and total cost. These scenarios have been created through alterations in WGS referral system, capacity, price, and willingness rate as well as testing time across different hospitals. The results showed that referring more patients for WGS will increase the number of diagnosed patients (by 30%), however it will impose more cost on the system (by 20%) due to higher cost of WGS. Therefore, investment strategies toward reducing cost of WGS as well as reimbursement policies can be beneficial to make WGS more economic and accessible. This study shows how the developed SD model can contribute to providing insights for policy makers in finding the optimal way for implementing WGS.

Discover OncologyVol. 16(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre (AU), University of New Haven (US), Cancer Australia (AU), Community Options (United States) (US), Melbourne Health (AU), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
University of Melbourne
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.