Australia’s best practice guidelines for information access in the informed consent process for people with vision impairment: A scoping review using the AACTT framework

Background Providing accessible information during informed consent practice helps people make important decisions about research participation. The aim of this review is to critically appraise the current Australian clinical research guidelines to assess their guidance on delivering accessible informed consent processes for people with vision impairment. Methods An archival search of the Overton database was conducted for policy documents and guidelines pertaining to informed consent practice in Australia. This was cross checked with the Australian Research Council’s online catalogue of national codes and guidelines. Content analysis was performed using an implementation science framework to code the actors, actions, context, target and time (AACTT) elements of informed consent practice. The AACTT framework enables a detailed specification of the behaviours targeted for championing or change. Results Ten policy documents specific to conducting consent procedures for clinical research or healthcare participation in Australia were identified and included in this review. Five of the 10 guidelines provided sufficient detail for researchers to know what actions to perform to enable inclusive consent practice and mutual engagement with people with vision impairment. However, they varied in their content describing how and when to perform them. Two of the key reference documents for clinical research conduct in Australia entirely lacked recommendations for accessible informed consent practice. Conclusions Australian research policy and practice documents offer some direction in helping researchers to deliver accessible informed consent practice. However, guidelines produced by peak disability bodies and patient advocacy groups offer more direction on how to engage people with vision impairment and offer useful templates for producing accessible print materials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences
Published
2025-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/26320843251379255
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Australia’s best practice guidelines for information access in the informed consent process for people with vision impairment: A scoping review using the AACTT framework

Fleur O’Hare, Maria Kolic, Tessa Saunders, Camille Paynter et al.
Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

Australia’s best practice guidelines for information access in the informed consent process for people with vision impairment: A scoping review using the AACTT framework

Fleur O’Hare, Maria Kolic, Tessa Saunders, Camille Paynter, Lauren N. Ayton, David Foran, Caroline Ondracek
article en

Abstract

Background Providing accessible information during informed consent practice helps people make important decisions about research participation. The aim of this review is to critically appraise the current Australian clinical research guidelines to assess their guidance on delivering accessible informed consent processes for people with vision impairment. Methods An archival search of the Overton database was conducted for policy documents and guidelines pertaining to informed consent practice in Australia. This was cross checked with the Australian Research Council’s online catalogue of national codes and guidelines. Content analysis was performed using an implementation science framework to code the actors, actions, context, target and time (AACTT) elements of informed consent practice. The AACTT framework enables a detailed specification of the behaviours targeted for championing or change. Results Ten policy documents specific to conducting consent procedures for clinical research or healthcare participation in Australia were identified and included in this review. Five of the 10 guidelines provided sufficient detail for researchers to know what actions to perform to enable inclusive consent practice and mutual engagement with people with vision impairment. However, they varied in their content describing how and when to perform them. Two of the key reference documents for clinical research conduct in Australia entirely lacked recommendations for accessible informed consent practice. Conclusions Australian research policy and practice documents offer some direction in helping researchers to deliver accessible informed consent practice. However, guidelines produced by peak disability bodies and patient advocacy groups offer more direction on how to engage people with vision impairment and offer useful templates for producing accessible print materials.

Research Methods in Medicine & Health SciencesVol. 7(2)
Royal Children's Hospital (AU), Andalusian Health Service (ES), The University of Melbourne (AU), Australian College of Optometry (AU), Noosa Hospital (AU), Centre for Eye Research Australia (AU), Melbourne Health (AU), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.