Prediction of personalized antiseizure medications response based on clinical signatures in epilepsy

Despite the increasing number of available antiseizure medications (ASMs), optimal medical therapy is still a process of trial and error. We aimed to predict the responsiveness of various ASMs based on initial tests using artificial intelligence. The study consisted of 2586 patients fulfilling the following criteria: (1) first visit to the epileptologists from 2008 to 2017, (2) a diagnosis of epilepsy, and 3) ≥ three years of follow-up duration. The clinical characteristics, ASM history, seizure frequency, laboratory, EEG, and MRI results, were collected. Machine algorithms were utilized to predict the responsiveness of specific regimens. Valproate showed the highest area under curve (AUC), 0.636. The AUCs of levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine were 0.614, 0.633, and 0.674. The AUCs of common dual regimens were 0.543 for levetiracetam + oxcarbazepine, 0.454 for levetiracetam + valproate, and 0.583 for levetiracetam + lamotrigine. Levetiracetam + carbamazepine showed the highest AUC, 0.686. In Shapley Additive exPlanations analysis, seizure type significantly impacted prediction performance for valproate responsiveness, and onset age and disease duration for lamotrigine. The prediction performances for the response based on initial data differ according to ASMs. An enormous dataset from a multicenter would improve the prediction power of ASM responsiveness in the future.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-16881-x
Primary Topic
Epilepsy research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction of personalized antiseizure medications response based on clinical signatures in epilepsy

Youmin Shin, Jangsup Moon, Kyungil Park, Keun‐Hwa Jung et al.
Scientific Reports
Epilepsy research and treatment
article

Prediction of personalized antiseizure medications response based on clinical signatures in epilepsy

Youmin Shin, Jangsup Moon, Kyungil Park, Keun‐Hwa Jung, Seung-Bo Lee, Hyoshin Son, Sungeun Hwang, Kon Chu, Yong-Jeong Kim, Young-Gon Kim, Soon‐Tae Lee, Sang Kun Lee, Ki-Young Jung
article en

Abstract

Despite the increasing number of available antiseizure medications (ASMs), optimal medical therapy is still a process of trial and error. We aimed to predict the responsiveness of various ASMs based on initial tests using artificial intelligence. The study consisted of 2586 patients fulfilling the following criteria: (1) first visit to the epileptologists from 2008 to 2017, (2) a diagnosis of epilepsy, and 3) ≥ three years of follow-up duration. The clinical characteristics, ASM history, seizure frequency, laboratory, EEG, and MRI results, were collected. Machine algorithms were utilized to predict the responsiveness of specific regimens. Valproate showed the highest area under curve (AUC), 0.636. The AUCs of levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, and lamotrigine were 0.614, 0.633, and 0.674. The AUCs of common dual regimens were 0.543 for levetiracetam + oxcarbazepine, 0.454 for levetiracetam + valproate, and 0.583 for levetiracetam + lamotrigine. Levetiracetam + carbamazepine showed the highest AUC, 0.686. In Shapley Additive exPlanations analysis, seizure type significantly impacted prediction performance for valproate responsiveness, and onset age and disease duration for lamotrigine. The prediction performances for the response based on initial data differ according to ASMs. An enormous dataset from a multicenter would improve the prediction power of ASM responsiveness in the future.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Ewha Womans University (KR), Seoul National University (KR), New Generation University College (ET), Seoul National University Hospital (KR), St. Mary's Hospital (US), St. Mary's Hospital (US), Keimyung University (KR)
Korea Health Industry Development Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Epilepsy research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.