The Impact of Hybrid Collaboration Methods on Idea Quantity, Quality, and Collaborative Interactions

The hybrid collaboration method, which combines individual and collaborative idea generation sequentially, can help generate more creative ideas compared to collaborating from the beginning, by encouraging active participation during collaboration. While the effectiveness of hybrid collaboration methods varies depending on the combination order of individual and collaborative idea generation, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal order. To examine the optimal order, this study investigated the effects of the hybrid collaboration method based on the combination order, on the quantity and quality of generated ideas, as well as collaborative interactions. An experiment with 87 participants showed that participants using a hybrid collaboration method generated significantly more ideas than those who collaborated from the beginning. Although no significant differences were found in the quality of all generated ideas across conditions, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating produced higher-quality top three ideas. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the amount of collaborative interaction, even with reduced collaboration time in the hybrid collaboration methods. Notably, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating focused more on ideation during their interactions. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid collaboration methods, particularly individual ideation before collaboration, as an effective strategy for enhancing creativity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychological Reports
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941251383513
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of Hybrid Collaboration Methods on Idea Quantity, Quality, and Collaborative Interactions

Min Hae Song, Jaeseo Lim, H. W. Kim, Jooyong Park
Psychological Reports
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

The Impact of Hybrid Collaboration Methods on Idea Quantity, Quality, and Collaborative Interactions

Min Hae Song, Jaeseo Lim, H. W. Kim, Jooyong Park
article en

Abstract

The hybrid collaboration method, which combines individual and collaborative idea generation sequentially, can help generate more creative ideas compared to collaborating from the beginning, by encouraging active participation during collaboration. While the effectiveness of hybrid collaboration methods varies depending on the combination order of individual and collaborative idea generation, there is ongoing debate regarding the optimal order. To examine the optimal order, this study investigated the effects of the hybrid collaboration method based on the combination order, on the quantity and quality of generated ideas, as well as collaborative interactions. An experiment with 87 participants showed that participants using a hybrid collaboration method generated significantly more ideas than those who collaborated from the beginning. Although no significant differences were found in the quality of all generated ideas across conditions, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating produced higher-quality top three ideas. Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the amount of collaborative interaction, even with reduced collaboration time in the hybrid collaboration methods. Notably, participants who generated ideas individually before collaborating focused more on ideation during their interactions. These findings highlight the potential of hybrid collaboration methods, particularly individual ideation before collaboration, as an effective strategy for enhancing creativity.

Psychological Reports
Seoul National University (KR), New Generation University College (ET), Jeonju University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.