A – 15 The Potential for Misdiagnosis in Hispanic/Latino Older Adults

Abstract Objective Latinos represent the largest and fastest growing ethnic minority group in the United States and show increased risk of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. However, demographically adjusted normative data that represents this group is lacking and likely contributes to misdiagnosis. The purpose of this study was to explore differences in standard scores when using normative data derived from non-Hispanic vs. Hispanic samples. Method Participants included 11 Hispanic/Latino older adults recruited from a primary care clinic (Age: X-= 69.91, SD= 1.71; Education: X-= 16.09, SD= 1.31; Males= 5). Raw scores on six cognitive measures, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) Immediate Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recall, Letter Fluency, Animal Naming, and Trail Making Test Parts A and B, were converted to T-Scores using non-Hispanic and Hispanic normative data and compared using paired samples t-tests. Results There were significant differences between T-scores on all six tasks, with higher T scores obtained when using Hispanic norms: HVLT-R Immediate Recall (p <.001), HVLT-R Delayed Recall (p <.001), Letter Fluency (p <.001), Animal Naming (p <.001), Trail Making Test Part A (p <.012), and Part B (p <.01). Conclusion Findings confirm that the use of demographically adjusted norms is crucial in standard neuropsychological evaluations. Failure to account for cultural differences in Hispanic/Latino older adults specifically can over pathologize findings, leading to misdiagnosis, especially when interpreting language-based tasks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaf084.039
Primary Topic
Health and Well-being Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A – 15 The Potential for Misdiagnosis in Hispanic/Latino Older Adults

Joshua Chang, L Guadagno, Robin C. Hilsabeck, M. Trinidad Cifuentes Muñoz et al.
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Health and Well-being Studies
article

A – 15 The Potential for Misdiagnosis in Hispanic/Latino Older Adults

Joshua Chang, L Guadagno, Robin C. Hilsabeck, M. Trinidad Cifuentes Muñoz, Heather E. Cuevas, Nusha Kheradbin, Scott Selinger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective Latinos represent the largest and fastest growing ethnic minority group in the United States and show increased risk of mild cognitive impairment, Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. However, demographically adjusted normative data that represents this group is lacking and likely contributes to misdiagnosis. The purpose of this study was to explore differences in standard scores when using normative data derived from non-Hispanic vs. Hispanic samples. Method Participants included 11 Hispanic/Latino older adults recruited from a primary care clinic (Age: X-= 69.91, SD= 1.71; Education: X-= 16.09, SD= 1.31; Males= 5). Raw scores on six cognitive measures, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Revised (HVLT-R) Immediate Recall, HVLT-R Delayed Recall, Letter Fluency, Animal Naming, and Trail Making Test Parts A and B, were converted to T-Scores using non-Hispanic and Hispanic normative data and compared using paired samples t-tests. Results There were significant differences between T-scores on all six tasks, with higher T scores obtained when using Hispanic norms: HVLT-R Immediate Recall (p <.001), HVLT-R Delayed Recall (p <.001), Letter Fluency (p <.001), Animal Naming (p <.001), Trail Making Test Part A (p <.012), and Part B (p <.01). Conclusion Findings confirm that the use of demographically adjusted norms is crucial in standard neuropsychological evaluations. Failure to account for cultural differences in Hispanic/Latino older adults specifically can over pathologize findings, leading to misdiagnosis, especially when interpreting language-based tasks.

Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyVol. 40(Supplement_2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Health and Well-being Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.