Comparative study on electronic structures of two phases compounds and origin of the structural phase transition in LiFePO <sub>4</sub>

Abstract LiFePO 4 has normal olivine-structured ( α -LFP) and high pressure ( β -LFP) phases, with the former being one of the cathode materials for commercial Li-ion batteries. Despite extensive focus on the respective electrochemical properties of the two phases, there is a lack of comparative studies on their electronic and magnetic properties, and the origin of the structural phase transition remains unclear. By combining first-principles calculations with molecular dynamics simulations, we find that the anisotropic compression of Li–O bonds drives the structural phase transition from α -LFP to β -LFP at a critical pressure of 20 GPa, while β -LFP undergoes a transition from semiconductor to metal due to Fe 3+ generated during delithiation. Their antiferromagnetic (AFM) ground states are predicted to arise from the negative magnetic exchange interactions between nearest and next-nearest neighbor sites, with the corresponding Néel temperature showing significant enhancement under pressure. Furthermore, compared with α -LFP, β -LFP shows increases in bulk, shear, and Young’s moduli of 8%, 13%, and 12%, respectively. These findings enrich the physical property data of LiFePO 4 phase compounds, providing knowledge for expanding the application scenarios of the α -LFP phase under special operating conditions such as high pressure.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chinese Physics B
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/ae0bfe
Primary Topic
Advancements in Battery Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study on electronic structures of two phases compounds and origin of the structural phase transition in LiFePO 4

Jie Li, Siqi Shi, Xiangyi Du, P.‐W. YANG
Chinese Physics B
Advancements in Battery Materials
article

Comparative study on electronic structures of two phases compounds and origin of the structural phase transition in LiFePO 4

Jie Li, Siqi Shi, Xiangyi Du, P.‐W. YANG
article en

Abstract

Abstract LiFePO 4 has normal olivine-structured ( α -LFP) and high pressure ( β -LFP) phases, with the former being one of the cathode materials for commercial Li-ion batteries. Despite extensive focus on the respective electrochemical properties of the two phases, there is a lack of comparative studies on their electronic and magnetic properties, and the origin of the structural phase transition remains unclear. By combining first-principles calculations with molecular dynamics simulations, we find that the anisotropic compression of Li–O bonds drives the structural phase transition from α -LFP to β -LFP at a critical pressure of 20 GPa, while β -LFP undergoes a transition from semiconductor to metal due to Fe 3+ generated during delithiation. Their antiferromagnetic (AFM) ground states are predicted to arise from the negative magnetic exchange interactions between nearest and next-nearest neighbor sites, with the corresponding Néel temperature showing significant enhancement under pressure. Furthermore, compared with α -LFP, β -LFP shows increases in bulk, shear, and Young’s moduli of 8%, 13%, and 12%, respectively. These findings enrich the physical property data of LiFePO 4 phase compounds, providing knowledge for expanding the application scenarios of the α -LFP phase under special operating conditions such as high pressure.

Chinese Physics BVol. 34(11)
Shanghai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Advancements in Battery Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.