IVC Filters in Integrated Acute Pulmonary Embolism Management—A Narrative Review

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity despite increasing prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The IVC filter is a temporary or permanent intravascular device that traps migrating thrombi from their origin in the pelvis or a lower limb into the pulmonary vasculature, thereby preventing significant APE. The current and longstanding indications for placing an IVC filter are in patients with documented lower extremity DVT and acute APE who also have absolute contraindications to anticoagulation or have experienced an acute, hemodynamically unstable APE requiring ventilatory and vasoactive support, with limited cardiovascular reserve. Updated guidelines have led to a significant rise in IVC filter placements for specific therapeutic indications of venous thromboembolism compared to prophylactic use. Meta-analyses show that IVC filter placement is associated with a lower risk of subsequent APE but an increased risk of DVT. However, there appears to be no significant reduction in APE-related mortality and no change in all-cause mortality. Early complications after IVC filter placement typically relate to procedural issues and include bleeding or infection at the venous access site, development of arteriovenous fistulas, accidental arterial puncture, and post-procedural access site hematoma or thrombosis. Additional early complications include IVC filter malposition, incomplete expansion, IVC penetration, or guidewire entrapment. Delayed complications may involve DVT below the filter, IVC occlusion due to the filter, IVC filter migration, fracture of one of the IVC filter components, IVC rupture, or IVC thrombosis. Retrieval of IVC filters by simple, advanced, or open techniques should be considered after weighing the risk-to-benefit for the individual patient. Deployment of the IVC filter remains an important component of interventional APE management within the narrow indications currently proposed. Current guidance recommends that an untethered temporary IVC filter should be placed and retrieved once the contraindication to anticoagulation is resolved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14196810
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IVC Filters in Integrated Acute Pulmonary Embolism Management—A Narrative Review

Mark G. Davies, Joseph P. Hart
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
1.87
article

IVC Filters in Integrated Acute Pulmonary Embolism Management—A Narrative Review

Mark G. Davies, Joseph P. Hart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Acute pulmonary embolism (APE) remains a significant cause of mortality and morbidity despite increasing prophylaxis for deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The IVC filter is a temporary or permanent intravascular device that traps migrating thrombi from their origin in the pelvis or a lower limb into the pulmonary vasculature, thereby preventing significant APE. The current and longstanding indications for placing an IVC filter are in patients with documented lower extremity DVT and acute APE who also have absolute contraindications to anticoagulation or have experienced an acute, hemodynamically unstable APE requiring ventilatory and vasoactive support, with limited cardiovascular reserve. Updated guidelines have led to a significant rise in IVC filter placements for specific therapeutic indications of venous thromboembolism compared to prophylactic use. Meta-analyses show that IVC filter placement is associated with a lower risk of subsequent APE but an increased risk of DVT. However, there appears to be no significant reduction in APE-related mortality and no change in all-cause mortality. Early complications after IVC filter placement typically relate to procedural issues and include bleeding or infection at the venous access site, development of arteriovenous fistulas, accidental arterial puncture, and post-procedural access site hematoma or thrombosis. Additional early complications include IVC filter malposition, incomplete expansion, IVC penetration, or guidewire entrapment. Delayed complications may involve DVT below the filter, IVC occlusion due to the filter, IVC filter migration, fracture of one of the IVC filter components, IVC rupture, or IVC thrombosis. Retrieval of IVC filters by simple, advanced, or open techniques should be considered after weighing the risk-to-benefit for the individual patient. Deployment of the IVC filter remains an important component of interventional APE management within the narrow indications currently proposed. Current guidance recommends that an untethered temporary IVC filter should be placed and retrieved once the contraindication to anticoagulation is resolved.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 14(19)
Ascension (US), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Center for Outcomes Research in Liver Diseases (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.