Framing Objectivity in Agrarian Conflict Reporting: A Comparative Analysis of Local, Sectoral, and National Media Coverage of Pakel Village

This study aims to analyze and compare the objectivity of three online media portals in constructing news about agrarian conflict in Pakel Village. The study method used is the framing analysis model of Zhondang Pan & Gerald M. Kosicki, which divides the way for the media to construct facts through 4 elements, namely, syntactic structure, script, thematic, and rhetorical. The results of the study show that objectivity in reporting agrarian conflict in Pakel Village by journalists from Banyuwangi.viva.co.id, Betahita.id, and Tempo.co has written information and facts by writing news that is sourced from statements related to the incident. Comparison of the objectivity of these three online media news portals, namely Banyuwangi.viva.co.id focuses more on the narrative of harmony and mediation, but tends to be less critical of the authorities. Betahita.id is more on the side of farmers, emphasizing aspects of advocacy and criticism of injustice. Tempo.co provides a more balanced and in-depth report with an investigative style that considers various perspectives.