Interprofessional tensions on designing an arts-based theatre intervention in a rehabilitation setting

This study examines the tensions encountered by an interprofessional team collaborating to design an arts-based theater intervention in a rehabilitation setting. A qualitative focus group with 13 participants, including clinicians, patient participants, researchers, and theater professionals, identified five key tensions: defining the intervention (physicality vs. intellectualization), roles of clinicians (defined vs. transversal), objectives of the intervention (therapeutic vs. theatrical), modality of the intervention (individual vs. group), and target population (specific vs. general). These findings underscore the challenge of balancing disciplinary expertise with innovation in collaborative settings. Reflective practices can help navigate these tensions, fostering integration of creative and clinical approaches. Future research should examine how such dynamics shape collaboration across diverse contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2025.2562066
Primary Topic
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interprofessional tensions on designing an arts-based theatre intervention in a rehabilitation setting

Camille D’Anjou, Maud Gendron-Langevin, Stefano Rezzonico, Guylaine Le Dorze et al.
Journal of Interprofessional Care
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
article

Interprofessional tensions on designing an arts-based theatre intervention in a rehabilitation setting

Camille D’Anjou, Maud Gendron-Langevin, Stefano Rezzonico, Guylaine Le Dorze, Ingrid Verduyckt, Sébastien Finlay
article en

Abstract

This study examines the tensions encountered by an interprofessional team collaborating to design an arts-based theater intervention in a rehabilitation setting. A qualitative focus group with 13 participants, including clinicians, patient participants, researchers, and theater professionals, identified five key tensions: defining the intervention (physicality vs. intellectualization), roles of clinicians (defined vs. transversal), objectives of the intervention (therapeutic vs. theatrical), modality of the intervention (individual vs. group), and target population (specific vs. general). These findings underscore the challenge of balancing disciplinary expertise with innovation in collaborative settings. Reflective practices can help navigate these tensions, fostering integration of creative and clinical approaches. Future research should examine how such dynamics shape collaboration across diverse contexts.

Journal of Interprofessional CareVol. 40(1)
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Centre for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation (CA), Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-Montréal (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.