Spatial characteristics of trends in hydrological load displacement at global GNSS reference stations

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) reference station coordinate time series contain significant environmental loading signals, among which vertical deformations due to hydrological loading are particularly prominent. Many studies have focused on the nonlinear motions and noise characteristics of GNSS stations caused by hydrological loading, whereas the impact of long-term linear trends associated with hydrological loading on GNSS vertical motion has received less attention. In this paper, we analyze the spatial variability in the linear trends of vertical displacements due to hydrological loading, using time series from 1628 GNSS reference stations worldwide (2010–2024). We compare three hydrological loading models (GFZ, GGFC, and IMLS) and evaluate their performance in correcting GNSS station height time series. Our results indicate that the ERA5 (GGFC) and IMLS models produce similar vertical linear trends, both of which closely match trends observed in GNSS vertical displacements. In contrast, the GFZ model exhibits significant spatial discrepancies and shows a weaker correlation with GNSS-derived trends. For example, GFZ predicts substantially smaller uplift trends than ERA5 and IMLS in central North America, west-central Europe, northern Australia, and the Middle East. Conversely, GFZ predicts higher uplift trends than the other two models in the Amazon Basin, south-central Africa, and Southeast Asia. These discrepancies likely stem from differences in each model’s representation of terrestrial hydrological processes, data assimilation techniques, and the inclusion or omission of factors such as groundwater extraction. Overall, this study provides a basis for comparing and validating global hydrological loading models and underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate model in GNSS-based geodynamics research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Applied Sciences
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-025-07725-4
Primary Topic
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial characteristics of trends in hydrological load displacement at global GNSS reference stations

Ran Lu, Zhao Li, Mingyuan Zhang, Shangzhe Sun et al.
Discover Applied Sciences
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
article

Spatial characteristics of trends in hydrological load displacement at global GNSS reference stations

Ran Lu, Zhao Li, Mingyuan Zhang, Shangzhe Sun, Xue Wang
article en

Abstract

Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) reference station coordinate time series contain significant environmental loading signals, among which vertical deformations due to hydrological loading are particularly prominent. Many studies have focused on the nonlinear motions and noise characteristics of GNSS stations caused by hydrological loading, whereas the impact of long-term linear trends associated with hydrological loading on GNSS vertical motion has received less attention. In this paper, we analyze the spatial variability in the linear trends of vertical displacements due to hydrological loading, using time series from 1628 GNSS reference stations worldwide (2010–2024). We compare three hydrological loading models (GFZ, GGFC, and IMLS) and evaluate their performance in correcting GNSS station height time series. Our results indicate that the ERA5 (GGFC) and IMLS models produce similar vertical linear trends, both of which closely match trends observed in GNSS vertical displacements. In contrast, the GFZ model exhibits significant spatial discrepancies and shows a weaker correlation with GNSS-derived trends. For example, GFZ predicts substantially smaller uplift trends than ERA5 and IMLS in central North America, west-central Europe, northern Australia, and the Middle East. Conversely, GFZ predicts higher uplift trends than the other two models in the Amazon Basin, south-central Africa, and Southeast Asia. These discrepancies likely stem from differences in each model’s representation of terrestrial hydrological processes, data assimilation techniques, and the inclusion or omission of factors such as groundwater extraction. Overall, this study provides a basis for comparing and validating global hydrological loading models and underscores the importance of selecting an appropriate model in GNSS-based geodynamics research.

Discover Applied SciencesVol. 7(10)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Wuhan University (CN), Shanghai Micro Satellite Engineering Center (CN), Beijing Haidian Hospital (CN), Innovation Academy for Microsatellites of Chinese Academy of Sciences
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Institute of Museum and Library Services, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.