The Role of Early Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19

Nutrition support is a crucial component of managing critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between early enteral nutrition (EEN) and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Data were retrospectively collected and compared between early EN (n: 101) and late EN (n: 34) groups. Patients (99.3%) were at high nutrition risk (NRS-2002 ≥ 3). the EEN group received a significantly higher daily amount of calories (8.7 ± 4.92 vs 3.1 ± 3.29 kcal/kg, P < .001), protein (0.4 ± 0.23 vs 0.1 ± 0.15 g/kg, P < .001), fiber (12.3 ± 6.52 vs 3.8 ± 4.15 g/day, P < .001), water (533.6 [482.19] vs 184.3 [272] mL/day, P < .001). However, nutrition targets were not achieved in all groups and EEN was not associated with improved outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Topics in Clinical Nutrition
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/tin.0000000000000405
Primary Topic
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Early Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19

Selen Özsoy, Mendane Saka, Levent Öztürk
Topics in Clinical Nutrition
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
article

The Role of Early Enteral Nutrition in Critically Ill Patients With COVID-19

Selen Özsoy, Mendane Saka, Levent Öztürk
article en

Abstract

Nutrition support is a crucial component of managing critically ill patients. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between early enteral nutrition (EEN) and clinical outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19. Data were retrospectively collected and compared between early EN (n: 101) and late EN (n: 34) groups. Patients (99.3%) were at high nutrition risk (NRS-2002 ≥ 3). the EEN group received a significantly higher daily amount of calories (8.7 ± 4.92 vs 3.1 ± 3.29 kcal/kg, P < .001), protein (0.4 ± 0.23 vs 0.1 ± 0.15 g/kg, P < .001), fiber (12.3 ± 6.52 vs 3.8 ± 4.15 g/day, P < .001), water (533.6 [482.19] vs 184.3 [272] mL/day, P < .001). However, nutrition targets were not achieved in all groups and EEN was not associated with improved outcomes.

Topics in Clinical NutritionVol. 40(4)
Sakarya University (TR), Sakarya Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Niabi Zoological Society (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.