Dyadic Profiles of Romantic Partners' Suicidal Risk and Relationship Distress Presenting for Couples Therapy

Despite the prominence of individuals presenting for therapy with suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), there is little research available that examines how one or both members of a couple experience STBs when presenting for couple therapy. Thus, there is a prominent gap in the literature in understanding the types of STBs for both adult partners in a committed romantic relationship presenting for couple therapy, reducing clinicians' preparedness to address suicidality in this unique therapy modality. We applied the Three-Step Theory as a guiding framework to investigate the types of couples with suicidal risk that present to couple therapy. We used clinical data from the Marriage and Family Therapy Practice Research Network (n = 337 couples) to identify Dyadic Latent Profiles. We determined a three-profile model: Profile 1: Minimal Risk; Profile 2: Active and Passive Risk; and Profile 3: Both Passive Risk. However, nearly all predictors and covariates (e.g., biological sex, race, relationship duration, mental health treatment, pressure to attend therapy, and intimate partner violence) were not associated with profile membership. These results indicate that while most couples who attend couple therapy are unlikely to display elevated suicide risk, 7% of the sample (Profile 2) displayed active risk based on the Three-Step Theory of suicide. These findings aid clinicians in understanding that a small number of couples present an active risk. Results further encourage clinicians to assess STBs with continuous and not binary assessment questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Process
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.70074
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dyadic Profiles of Romantic Partners' Suicidal Risk and Relationship Distress Presenting for Couples Therapy

Quintin A. Hunt, Preston Morgan, Heather A. Love, Garrin L. Morlan
Family Process
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

Dyadic Profiles of Romantic Partners' Suicidal Risk and Relationship Distress Presenting for Couples Therapy

Quintin A. Hunt, Preston Morgan, Heather A. Love, Garrin L. Morlan
article en

Abstract

Despite the prominence of individuals presenting for therapy with suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs), there is little research available that examines how one or both members of a couple experience STBs when presenting for couple therapy. Thus, there is a prominent gap in the literature in understanding the types of STBs for both adult partners in a committed romantic relationship presenting for couple therapy, reducing clinicians' preparedness to address suicidality in this unique therapy modality. We applied the Three-Step Theory as a guiding framework to investigate the types of couples with suicidal risk that present to couple therapy. We used clinical data from the Marriage and Family Therapy Practice Research Network (n = 337 couples) to identify Dyadic Latent Profiles. We determined a three-profile model: Profile 1: Minimal Risk; Profile 2: Active and Passive Risk; and Profile 3: Both Passive Risk. However, nearly all predictors and covariates (e.g., biological sex, race, relationship duration, mental health treatment, pressure to attend therapy, and intimate partner violence) were not associated with profile membership. These results indicate that while most couples who attend couple therapy are unlikely to display elevated suicide risk, 7% of the sample (Profile 2) displayed active risk based on the Three-Step Theory of suicide. These findings aid clinicians in understanding that a small number of couples present an active risk. Results further encourage clinicians to assess STBs with continuous and not binary assessment questions.

Family ProcessVol. 64(4)
Brigham Young University (US), University of Alabama (US), Oklahoma Department of Human Services (US), Oklahoma State University Oklahoma City (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.