National Features of Discourse: A Systematic Review

While linguacultural studies are increasingly present in modern linguistics, the field still lacks clarity regarding its scope and applicable methods. This systematic review synthesized 20 studies on national features of discourse in its various types, selected from the EBSCOhost databases. The general analysis showed that most studies were conducted in Kazakhstan, the Middle East, and Africa, with a marked increase in publications after 2020. The in-depth analysis revealed that proverbial discourse was the most frequently examined type (n = 9), often linked to gender issues, while other types such as familial, education, media, and political discourse received limited attention. The findings demonstrate that English culture dominates both monocultural and cross-cultural studies, whereas Kazakh and Russian cultures remain underexplored. Methodologically, critical discourse analysis and conceptual analysis were most widely used, confirming their relevance for identifying national features in discourse. The review concludes that future linguacultural research should expand beyond proverbial and gender-focused studies, strengthen comparative analyses involving Kazakh and Russian discourses, and diversify methodological approaches. These results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of national discourse features and offer practical implications for culturally informed language education and cross-cultural communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
World Journal of English Language
Published
2025-09-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v16n2p44
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

National Features of Discourse: A Systematic Review

Kulzat Sadirova, Aigul Aitbenbetova, Guldana Nauryzbaikyzy, Aigul Imangazina
World Journal of English Language
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

National Features of Discourse: A Systematic Review

Kulzat Sadirova, Aigul Aitbenbetova, Guldana Nauryzbaikyzy, Aigul Imangazina
article en

Abstract

While linguacultural studies are increasingly present in modern linguistics, the field still lacks clarity regarding its scope and applicable methods. This systematic review synthesized 20 studies on national features of discourse in its various types, selected from the EBSCOhost databases. The general analysis showed that most studies were conducted in Kazakhstan, the Middle East, and Africa, with a marked increase in publications after 2020. The in-depth analysis revealed that proverbial discourse was the most frequently examined type (n = 9), often linked to gender issues, while other types such as familial, education, media, and political discourse received limited attention. The findings demonstrate that English culture dominates both monocultural and cross-cultural studies, whereas Kazakh and Russian cultures remain underexplored. Methodologically, critical discourse analysis and conceptual analysis were most widely used, confirming their relevance for identifying national features in discourse. The review concludes that future linguacultural research should expand beyond proverbial and gender-focused studies, strengthen comparative analyses involving Kazakh and Russian discourses, and diversify methodological approaches. These results contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of national discourse features and offer practical implications for culturally informed language education and cross-cultural communication.

World Journal of English LanguageVol. 16(2)
Aktobe Regional State University named after K.Zhubanov (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.