A model of selective integration: higher education dynamics in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area

Purpose This paper aims to develop and apply a “selective integration” model to explain the dynamics of cross-border higher education in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA). It investigates the tensions between top-down, state-steered integration policies and the bottom-up, functional collaboration among universities. The study identifies the key drivers and barriers shaping regional integration by analysing policy design, cross-border university alliances and individual institutional strategies. Design/methodology/approach The analytical framework draws from theories of regional integration in political science combining three theoretical perspectives – sovereign, neo-functionalist and institutionalist – to analyse higher education integration across four dimensions: functional, academic, structural and cultural. This framework is applied through a qualitative, multi-component research design comprising: a systematic analysis of key policy documents; a case study of the GBA University Alliance and an analysis of the strategic responses of two leading Hong Kong universities and their mainland campuses. Findings The findings reveal a “selective integration” model where progress is highly uneven. Integration is actively promoted and advances rapidly in the functional and academic dimensions where it aligns with state-steered economic and technological goals and is enabled by university adaptation. However, integration is systematically constrained and progress is minimal in the structural and cultural dimensions, where deep-seated political differences and the preservation of regional autonomy act as powerful barriers. Research limitations/implications The study presents a novel framework combining political science integration theories, and higher education studies on cross-border higher education and internationalisation. In so doing it contributes a model of “permission-based spillover,” demonstrating how integration is achieved across political, historical and cultural boundaries. This model challenges the more traditional binary between deep supranational integration (e.g. the EU) and cautious intergovernmentalism, offering a framework for understanding state-steered regional integration where economic and technological synergies are pursued without threatening political autonomy. Originality/value This paper offers a novel interdisciplinary framework for analysing regional integration of higher education in politically complex and asymmetrical environments. The “selective integration” model provides a nuanced understanding of the GBA and serves as a crucial analytical counterpoint to the EU’s supranational model. It offers insights for other regions, such as ASEAN and Mercosur, that also navigate the tension between economic integration and the preservation of national sovereignty and regional autonomy, providing a guide for policymakers and university leaders in developing effective cross-border strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Transformations in Chinese Societies
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/stics-03-2025-0006
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A model of selective integration: higher education dynamics in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area

Tatiana Fumasoli, Taixing Shen
1 citations
Social Transformations in Chinese Societies
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
article

A model of selective integration: higher education dynamics in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area

Tatiana Fumasoli, Taixing Shen
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to develop and apply a “selective integration” model to explain the dynamics of cross-border higher education in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA). It investigates the tensions between top-down, state-steered integration policies and the bottom-up, functional collaboration among universities. The study identifies the key drivers and barriers shaping regional integration by analysing policy design, cross-border university alliances and individual institutional strategies. Design/methodology/approach The analytical framework draws from theories of regional integration in political science combining three theoretical perspectives – sovereign, neo-functionalist and institutionalist – to analyse higher education integration across four dimensions: functional, academic, structural and cultural. This framework is applied through a qualitative, multi-component research design comprising: a systematic analysis of key policy documents; a case study of the GBA University Alliance and an analysis of the strategic responses of two leading Hong Kong universities and their mainland campuses. Findings The findings reveal a “selective integration” model where progress is highly uneven. Integration is actively promoted and advances rapidly in the functional and academic dimensions where it aligns with state-steered economic and technological goals and is enabled by university adaptation. However, integration is systematically constrained and progress is minimal in the structural and cultural dimensions, where deep-seated political differences and the preservation of regional autonomy act as powerful barriers. Research limitations/implications The study presents a novel framework combining political science integration theories, and higher education studies on cross-border higher education and internationalisation. In so doing it contributes a model of “permission-based spillover,” demonstrating how integration is achieved across political, historical and cultural boundaries. This model challenges the more traditional binary between deep supranational integration (e.g. the EU) and cautious intergovernmentalism, offering a framework for understanding state-steered regional integration where economic and technological synergies are pursued without threatening political autonomy. Originality/value This paper offers a novel interdisciplinary framework for analysing regional integration of higher education in politically complex and asymmetrical environments. The “selective integration” model provides a nuanced understanding of the GBA and serves as a crucial analytical counterpoint to the EU’s supranational model. It offers insights for other regions, such as ASEAN and Mercosur, that also navigate the tension between economic integration and the preservation of national sovereignty and regional autonomy, providing a guide for policymakers and university leaders in developing effective cross-border strategies.

Social Transformations in Chinese Societies
The London College (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Higher Education Governance and Development
8.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.