Participants’ reactions to the inclusion of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) measures in an established large-scale cohort: The California Teachers Study

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations are more likely than non-SGM populations to experience poor health outcomes but are underrepresented in research. The California Teachers Study (CTS) is a large prospective observational cohort that, in its 2017-2019 survey, included sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measures and also asked participants to provide feedback on the questionnaire. We conducted an inductive content analysis of participants' feedback responses and used these qualitative codes to a) identify which participants commented on SOGI and b) establish whether these participants had a positive, negative, or ambiguous reaction to the measures. We used Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression to evaluate whether demographic factors were associated with reaction type. A total of 373(2%) of 19,496 respondents commented on the SOGI questions. Of these, 41% had negative reactions, 35% had ambiguous reactions, and 25% had positive reactions. Younger age (<65 years) was positively associated with positive reaction (OR=2.30; 95%CI, 1.23-4.32). Non-white participants had lower adjusted odds of having a negative reaction to the SOGI measures compared to white participants (OR=0.38; 95%CI, 0.17-0.87). In this large established study of older adults, feedback on SOGI measures was rare but differed in frequency and content by participants' demographics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/e3da-q009
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participants’ reactions to the inclusion of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) measures in an established large-scale cohort: The California Teachers Study

Brittany M. Charlton, Caroline A. Thompson, Emma S. Spielfogel, Christine Duffy et al.
UNC Libraries
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Participants’ reactions to the inclusion of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity (SOGI) measures in an established large-scale cohort: The California Teachers Study

Brittany M. Charlton, Caroline A. Thompson, Emma S. Spielfogel, Christine Duffy, Kristen E. Savage, Christopher W. Wheldon, Marı́a Elena Martı́nez, James V. Lacey
article en

Abstract

Sexual and gender minority (SGM) populations are more likely than non-SGM populations to experience poor health outcomes but are underrepresented in research. The California Teachers Study (CTS) is a large prospective observational cohort that, in its 2017-2019 survey, included sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) measures and also asked participants to provide feedback on the questionnaire. We conducted an inductive content analysis of participants' feedback responses and used these qualitative codes to a) identify which participants commented on SOGI and b) establish whether these participants had a positive, negative, or ambiguous reaction to the measures. We used Chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression to evaluate whether demographic factors were associated with reaction type. A total of 373(2%) of 19,496 respondents commented on the SOGI questions. Of these, 41% had negative reactions, 35% had ambiguous reactions, and 25% had positive reactions. Younger age (<65 years) was positively associated with positive reaction (OR=2.30; 95%CI, 1.23-4.32). Non-white participants had lower adjusted odds of having a negative reaction to the SOGI measures compared to white participants (OR=0.38; 95%CI, 0.17-0.87). In this large established study of older adults, feedback on SOGI measures was rare but differed in frequency and content by participants' demographics.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.